ArticleAdvances in science and research2010
Ethics of primate use.
Article in Advances in science and research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predicting the presence of infectious virus from PCR data: A meta-analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in non-human primates.PLoS pathogens · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Effects of psychedelics on opioid use disorder: a scoping review of preclinical studies.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Article
- Behavioral Training in First-Generation Long-Tailed Macaques (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- The Benefits and Challenges of Conducting Primate Research in Different Settings.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Pig heart and lung xenotransplantation: Present status.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2022Article
- Invasive Research on Non-Human Primates-Time to Turn the Page.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Motility Profile of Captive-Bred Marmosets Revealed by a Long-Term In-Cage Monitoring System.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
- Ethical and Welfare Implications of Genetically Altered Non-Human Primates for Biomedical Research.Journal of applied animal ethics research · 2020Article
- Article
- The use of nonhuman primate models to understand processes in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2018Review
- A protocol for training group-housed rhesus macaques (Applied animal behaviour science · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This article provides an overview of the ethical issues raised by the use of non-human primates (NHPs) in research involving scientific procedures which may cause pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm. It is not an exhaustive review of the literature and views on this subject, and it does not present any conclusions about the moral acceptability or otherwise of NHP research. Rather the aim has been to identify the ethical issues involved and to provide guidance on how these might be addressed, in particular by carefully examining the scientific rationale for NHP use, implementing fully the 3Rs principle of Russell and Burch (1959) and applying a robust "harm-benefit assessment" to research proposals involving NHPs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.