Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33841733›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2021

Management of dental anxiety via distraction technique.

Job Torres-Gomez, Stephen C Arnason, Wyeth L Hoopes, Kraig S Vandewalle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Job Torres-GomezDMD, MS. Capt, USAF, DC. Deputy Program Director. Advanced Education in General Dentistry Residency. Air Force Postgraduate Dental School. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. 2501 Capehart Rd. Offutt, Air Force Base, Bellevue, NE, USA.
Stephen C ArnasonDDS, MS. Maj, USAF, DC. Training Officer. Advanced Education in General Dentistry Residency. Air Force Postgraduate Dental School. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. 1615 Truemper St. Joint Base San Antonio - Lackland, TX, USA.
Wyeth L HoopesDDS, MS. Maj, USAF, DC. Training Officer. Advanced Education in General Dentistry Residency. Air Force Postgraduate Dental School. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. 1615 Truemper St. Joint Base San Antonio - Lackland, TX, USA.
Kraig S VandewalleDDS, MS. Col (ret), USAF, DC. Director of Dental Research. Advanced Education in General Dentistry Residency. Air Force Postgraduate Dental School. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. 1615 Truemper St. Joint Base San Antonio - Lackland, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a stress ball as a distraction technique on stress levels of patients undergoing a dental procedure. MATERIAL AND

methodsA randomized, split-mouth design was conducted using 20 adult subjects requiring scaling and root planing (Sc/RP) in all four quadrants. Each side of the mouth (maxillary/mandibular) received Sc/RP with local anesthetic with or without the use of a stress-ball distraction over two separate sessions. Subjects completed two pre-procedural questionnaires (Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI; Modified Dental Anxiety Scale, MDAS) before and after each treatment session. A Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) sensor (Neulog) was used throughout each session to measure skin conductance or sweat.

resultsNo significant difference in GSR scores was found during treatment with or without the use of the stress ball. Also, no significant differences in the change in STAI or MDAS scores were found with or without the use of a stress ball.

conclusionsThe results of this study found that the use of a stress ball as a distraction technique did not result in any significant reduction in stress levels in subjects undergoing scaling and root planing with local anesthesia.

Identifiers

PMID33841733
PMCPMC8020318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.