ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on patients with malignant obstructive jaundice complicated with diabetes mellitus.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and influencing factors of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary drainage in malignant obstructive jaundice patients.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on patients with malignant obstructive jaundice complicated with diabetes mellitus.
methodsPatients with malignant obstructive jaundice complicated with diabetes mellitus received surgery in Hengshui People's Hospital were divided into two groups: patients in one group received routine care (routine care group, RC group), and patients in another group received enhanced recovery after surgery on the basis of routine care (accelerated care group, AC group). The differences in patients' satisfaction with care and nursing effects between the two groups were compared.
resultsThe scores of nursing effects such as nursing records and surgical safety in the RC group were significantly lower than those in the AC group (P<0.001). The psychological state of patients in the AC group was better than that in the RC group after care (P<0.001). The nursing-sensitive quality indicators, the quality of life scores and the patients' nursing satisfaction in the AC group were all higher than those in the RC group (P<0.001). The incidence of adverse events in the AC group was significantly lower than that in the RC group (P=0.01).
conclusionCompared with routine care, the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery is better on patients with malignant obstructive jaundice complicated with diabetes mellitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33841713PMC8014349W3156969070What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.