Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33841566›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2021

Diagnostic significance of plasma lipid markers and machine learning-based algorithm for gastric cancer.

Ryo Saito, Kentaro Yoshimura, Katsutoshi Shoda, Shinji Furuya, Hidenori Akaike, Yoshihiko Kawaguchi, Tasuku Murata, Koretsugu Ogata, Tomohiko Iwano, Sen Takeda and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Research progress of machine learning applications in gastric cancer diagnosis and therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Lipids: Driving Forces in the Underlying Biology of Carcinogenesis.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryo SaitoFirst Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan.
Kentaro YoshimuraDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan.
Katsutoshi ShodaFirst Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan.
Shinji FuruyaFirst Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan.
Hidenori AkaikeFirst Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan.
Yoshihiko KawaguchiFirst Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan.
Tasuku MurataMS Business Unit, Life Science Business Department, Analytical and Measuring Instruments Division, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto 6048511, Japan.
Koretsugu OgataMS Business Unit, Life Science Business Department, Analytical and Measuring Instruments Division, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto 6048511, Japan.
Tomohiko IwanoDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan.
Sen TakedaDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan.
Daisuke IchikawaFirst Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan.
University of Yamanashi · JPShimadzu (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers may be of value for the early detection of gastric cancer (GC) and the preoperative identification of tumor characteristics to guide treatment strategies. The present study analyzed the expression levels of phospholipids in plasma from patients with GC using liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-MS) to detect reliable biomarkers for GC. Furthermore, combining the results with a machine learning strategy, the present study attempted to establish a diagnostic system for GC. A total of 20 plasma samples from preoperative patients with GC and 16 plasma samples from tumor-free patients (controls) were selected from our biobank named 'SHINGEN (Yamanashi Biobank of Gastroenterological Cancers)', which includes a total of 1,592 plasma samples, and were analyzed by LC/ESI-MS. The obtained data were discriminated using a machine learning-based diagnostic algorithm, whose discriminant ability was confirmed through leave-one-out cross-validation. Using LC/ESI-MS, the levels of 236 lipid molecules were determined. Biomarker analysis revealed that a few lipids that were downregulated in the GC group could discriminate between the GC and control groups. Whole lipid composition analysis using partial least squares regression revealed good discrimination ability between the GC and control groups. Integrative analysis of all molecules using the aforementioned machine learning method exhibited a diagnostic accuracy of 94.4% (specificity, 93.8%; sensitivity, 95.0%). In conclusion, the outcomes of the present study suggested the potential future application of the aforementioned system in clinical settings. By accumulating more reliable data, the present system will be able to detect early-stage cancer and will be capable of predicting the efficacy of each therapeutic strategy.

Indexed as

gastric cancerlipidomicsmachine learningmass spectrometryplasma

Identifiers

PMID33841566
PMCPMC8020384
OpenAlexW3138010118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.