Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33841397›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in immunology2021

Does Extended Interval Dosing Natalizumab Preserve Effectiveness in Multiple Sclerosis? A 7 Year-Retrospective Observational Study.

Javier Riancho, Sonia Setien, Jose Ramón Sánchez de la Torre, Marta Torres-Barquin, Mercedes Misiego, José Luis Pérez, Tamara Castillo-Triviño, Cristina Menéndez-García, Manuel Delgado-Alvarado

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Updated Perspectives on the Challenges of Managing Multiple Sclerosis During Pregnancy.Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Javier RianchoService of Neurology, Hospital Sierrallana-IDIVAL, Torrelavega, Spain.
Sonia SetienService of Neurology, Hospital Sierrallana-IDIVAL, Torrelavega, Spain.
Jose Ramón Sánchez de la TorreService of Neurology, Hospital Sierrallana-IDIVAL, Torrelavega, Spain.
Marta Torres-BarquinService of Radiology, Hospital Sierrallana, Torrelavega, Spain.
Mercedes MisiegoService of Neurology, Hospital Sierrallana-IDIVAL, Torrelavega, Spain.
José Luis PérezService of Neurology, Hospital Sierrallana-IDIVAL, Torrelavega, Spain.
Tamara Castillo-TriviñoService of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain.
Cristina Menéndez-GarcíaService of Radiology, Hospital Sierrallana, Torrelavega, Spain.
Manuel Delgado-AlvaradoService of Neurology, Hospital Sierrallana-IDIVAL, Torrelavega, Spain.
Hospital Sierrallana · ESBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESBiomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extended interval dosing (EID) of natalizumab has been suggested to be associated with a reduced risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and short-term preservation of efficacy but its long-term effectiveness remain unknown. We aimed to determine the long-term effectiveness and safety of natalizumab in an EID setting in a cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated for more than 7 years. We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study, including 39 (34 female, 5 male) patients with clinically definite relapsing-MS, initially treated with standard interval dosing (SID) of natalizumab (mean time 54 months [SD29]) who were then switched to EID, every 8 weeks (mean time 76 months [SD13]). The main outcome measures included the following: i) annualized relapse rate (ARR), ii) radiological activity, iii) disability progression, and iv) NEDA-3 no evidence of disease activity index. EID preserved ARR, radiological activity, and prevented disability worsening during follow-up. The proportion of patients maintaining their NEDA-3 status after 24, 48, and 72 months of natalizumab administration in EID was 94%, 73%, and 70%, respectively. Stratified analysis according to history of drug therapy showed that the EID of natalizumab was slightly more effective in naïve patients than in those previously treated with other immunosuppressive drugs. No cases of PML or other severe adverse reactions were reported. In conclusion, long-term therapy with natalizumab in an EID setting following an SID regimen maintained its disease-modifying activity, and was safe and well tolerated for over 7 years. These encouraging observational results need to be confirmed in controlled clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdultAntirheumatic AgentsDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityDrug SubstitutionFemaleHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisNatalizumabPrognosisRadiographyRetrospective StudiesAntirheumatic AgentsImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsNatalizumabdisease modifying therapyextended interval dosingmultiple sclerosisnatalizumabtreatment

Identifiers

PMID33841397
PMCPMC8027344
OpenAlexW3139694002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.