Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33841289›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

The Strengths and Barriers Recovery Scale (SABRS): Relationships Matter in Building Strengths and Overcoming Barriers.

David Best, Arun Sondhi, Lorna Brown, Mulka Nisic, Gera E Nagelhout, Thomas Martinelli, Dike van de Mheen, Wouter Vanderplasschen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

David BestDepartment of Criminology, College of Business, Law and Social Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom.
Arun SondhiTherapeutic Solutions (Addictions), London, United Kingdom.
Lorna BrownDepartment of Criminology, College of Business, Law and Social Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom.
Mulka NisicRecovered Users Network (RUN), Brussels, Belgium.
Gera E NagelhoutIVO Research Institute, The Hague, Netherlands.
Thomas MartinelliIVO Research Institute, The Hague, Netherlands.
Dike van de MheenTranzo, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Wouter VanderplasschenRecovery and Addiction Cluster, Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
IVO Addiction Research Institute · NLUniversity of Derby · GBAptevo Therapeutics (United Kingdom) · GBGhent University · BETilburg University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a well-established relationship between isolation and both morbidity and mortality in the context of addiction recovery, yet the protective effects of intimate and familial relationships have not been adequately assessed. The current paper uses the European Life In Recovery database to assess the association between relationship status and living with dependent children on recovery capital of people in recovery from drug addiction, operationalised by the Strengths And Barriers Recovery Scale (SABRS). The study participants were drawn from the REC-PATH study and supplemented by a second sample recruited by the Recovered Users Network (RUN) across various European countries, resulting in a combined sample of 1,313 individuals completing the survey, primarily online. The results show that, in recovery, those who are married or co-habiting reported significantly greater recovery strengths and fewer barriers to recovery, and reported greater gains in recovery capital across their recovery journeys. Similar associations are found for participants who have dependent children living with them. There is also some indication that this association is stronger for female than for male participants. Finally, having more people that one can rely on and a greater proportion of people in recovery in the social network are both linked to greater recovery capital and greater self-reported growth in recovery capital. We conclude that this study provides further evidence in favour of a "social cure" in recovery, in which close familial ties are associated with stronger recovery resources.

Indexed as

addictionbarriersconnectednessrecoverysocial relationsstrengthssubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID33841289
PMCPMC8033166
OpenAlexW3147526309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.