Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33841223›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Similarities and Differences Between Eye and Mouse Dynamics During Web Pages Exploration.

Alexandre Milisavljevic, Fabrice Abate, Thomas Le Bras, Bernard Gosselin, Matei Mancas, Karine Doré-Mazars

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandre MilisavljevicVision Action Cognition Laboratory, Psychology Institute, Université de Paris, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Fabrice AbateVision Action Cognition Laboratory, Psychology Institute, Université de Paris, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Thomas Le BrasVision Action Cognition Laboratory, Psychology Institute, Université de Paris, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Bernard GosselinInformation, Signal and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Numediart Institute, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium.
Matei MancasInformation, Signal and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Numediart Institute, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium.
Karine Doré-MazarsVision Action Cognition Laboratory, Psychology Institute, Université de Paris, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of eye movements is a common way to non-invasively understand and analyze human behavior. However, eye-tracking techniques are very hard to scale, and require expensive equipment and extensive expertise. In the context of web browsing, these issues could be overcome by studying the link between the eye and the computer mouse. Here, we propose new analysis methods, and a more advanced characterization of this link. To this end, we recorded the eye, mouse, and scroll movements of 151 participants exploring 18 dynamic web pages while performing free viewing and visual search tasks for 20 s. The data revealed significant differences of eye, mouse, and scroll parameters over time which stabilize at the end of exploration. This suggests the existence of a task-independent relationship between eye, mouse, and scroll parameters, which are characterized by two distinct patterns: one common pattern for movement parameters and a second for dwelling/fixation parameters. Within these patterns, mouse and eye movements remained consistent with each other, while the scrolling behaved the opposite way.

Indexed as

behaviorcomputer mouseeye movementscrollweb page

Identifiers

PMID33841223
PMCPMC8024563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.