Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33841166›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2021

Allosterism vs. Orthosterism: Recent Findings and Future Perspectives on A

Elisabetta Barresi, Claudia Martini, Federico Da Settimo, Giovanni Greco, Sabrina Taliani, Chiara Giacomelli, Maria Letizia Trincavelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. APurinergic signalling · 2025
    Review
  2. Ivy Leaf Dry Extract EA 575International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. [Recent research on gene polymorphisms related to caffeine therapy in preterm infants with apnea of prematurity].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabetta BarresiDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Claudia MartiniDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Federico Da SettimoDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giovanni GrecoDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Sabrina TalianiDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Chiara GiacomelliDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Maria Letizia TrincavelliDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of GPCR (G-coupled protein receptor) allosteric modulators has attracted increasing interest in the last decades. The use of allosteric modulators in therapy offers several advantages with respect to orthosteric ones, as they can fine-tune the tissue responses to the endogenous agonist. Since the discovery of the first A

Indexed as

A2B receptoradenosine receptorsallosteric modulatorsbone healingmesenchymal stromal cells

Identifiers

PMID33841166
PMCPMC8024542
OpenAlexW3137673573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.