Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33841074›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Agonal Factors Distort Gene-Expression Patterns in Human Postmortem Brains.

Jiacheng Dai, Yu Chen, Rujia Dai, Yi Jiang, Jianghua Tian, Sihan Liu, Meng Xu, Miao Li, Jiaqi Zhou, Chunyu Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jiacheng DaiCenter for Medical Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, School of Life Sciences, National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yu ChenCenter for Medical Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, School of Life Sciences, National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Rujia DaiUpstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States.
Yi JiangCenter for Medical Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, School of Life Sciences, National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jianghua TianCenter for Medical Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, School of Life Sciences, National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Sihan LiuCenter for Medical Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, School of Life Sciences, National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Meng XuCenter for Medical Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, School of Life Sciences, National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Miao LiCenter for Medical Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, School of Life Sciences, National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jiaqi ZhouCenter for Medical Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, School of Life Sciences, National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Chunyu LiuDepartment of Psychiatry, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States.
Chao ChenCenter for Medical Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, School of Life Sciences, National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agonal factors, the conditions that occur just prior to death, can impact the molecular quality of postmortem brains, influencing gene expression results. Our study used gene expression data of 262 samples from ROSMAP with the detailed terminal state recorded for each donor, such as fever, infection, and unconsciousness. Fever and infection were the primary contributors to brain gene expression changes, brain cell-type-specific gene expression, and cell proportion changes. Furthermore, we also found that previous studies of gene expression in postmortem brains were confounded by agonal factors. Therefore, correction for agonal factors is important in the step of data preprocessing. Our analyses revealed fever and infection contributing to gene expression changes in postmortem brains and emphasized the necessity of study designs that document and account for agonal factors.

Indexed as

agonal factorsbrain cell typesgene co-expressiongene expressionpost-mortem brain studies

Identifiers

PMID33841074
PMCPMC8027124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.