ArticleReview of economics of the household2021
Unequal consequences of Covid 19: representative evidence from six countries.
Article in Review of economics of the household, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed.
- Access to and self-reported health impacts of COVID-19 prevention measures on people with disabilities in Vietnam: Results from a cross-sectional study in three mega-cities.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on Brazilian families: a countrywide population-based survey.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Trends in educational inequality in healthy life expectancy in Denmark between 2010 and 2021: a population-based study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- For Better or Worse? Subjective Expectations and Cost-Benefit Trade-Offs in Health Behavior: An Application to Lockdown Compliance in the United Kingdom.Health economics · 2025Article
- Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on recognition and testimony memory: differential effects in young and older adults.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Article
- "Provided a window on the world and lessened my feeling of isolation": older adults' perceived COVID-19 impact and technology use in Australia during recurrent lockdowns.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Influences of public health emergency and social isolation on older adults' wellbeing: evidence from a longitudinal study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Quantifying the human impact of Melbourne's 111-day hard lockdown experiment on the adult population.Nature human behaviour · 2023Article
- Article
- Locked down: Ontological security and the experience of COVID-19 while living in poor-quality housing.Journal of community psychology · 2023Article
- Impacts of the COVID-19 crisis on single-person households in South Korea.Journal of Asian economics · 2023Article
- Wild and backyard food use during COVID-19 in upstate New York, United States.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on undergraduate and postgraduate students: A cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- The COVID-19 pandemic, well-being, and transitions to post-secondary education.Review of economics of the household · 2023Article
- Disparities and resilience: analyzing online Health information provision, behaviors and needs of LBGTQ + elders during COVID-19.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Frailty and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on community-living middle-aged and older adults: an analysis of data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA).Age and ageing · 2022Article
- "SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2022Article
- Modelling optimal lockdowns with waning immunity.Economic theory · 2022Article
- COVID-19 and Gender Gaps in Employment, Wages, and Work Hours: Lower Inequalities and Higher Motherhood Penalty.Comparative economic studies · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Covid-19 and the measures taken to contain it have led to unprecedented constraints on work and leisure activities, across the world. This paper uses nationally representative surveys to document how people of different ages and incomes have been affected in the early phase of the pandemic. The data was collected in six countries (China, South Korea, Japan, Italy, UK, and US) in the third week of April 2020. First, we document changes in job circumstances and social activities. Second, we document self-reported negative and positive consequences of the crisis on well-being. We find that young people have experienced more drastic changes to their life and have been most affected economically and psychologically. There is less of a systematic pattern across income groups. While lower income groups have been more affected economically, higher income groups have experienced more changes in their social life and spending. A large fraction of people of low and high income groups report negative effects on well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.