Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33840512›Full record

ArticleAnnals of emergency medicine2021

Emergency Department Utilization for Emergency Conditions During COVID-19.

Arjun K Venkatesh, Alexander T Janke, Li Shu-Xia, Craig Rothenberg, Pawan Goyal, Aisha Terry, Michelle Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arjun K VenkateshDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Electronic address: arjun.venkatesh@yale.edu.
Alexander T JankeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Li Shu-XiaCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Craig RothenbergDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Pawan GoyalAmerican College of Emergency Physicians, Irving, TX.
Aisha TerryGeorge Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
Michelle LinMount Sinai Health System, New York, NY.

Funding

The National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials NetworkUG1DA015831 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Gail D'Onofrio, Roger D. Weiss · 2015 to 2026
$110.8M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001862 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CANTLEY, LLOYD G, EDELMAN, E. JENNIFER · 2016 to 2025
$12.2M
Yale University Clinical and Translational Science Award ProgramKL2TR000140 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2012 to 2015
$2.9M
PROAACT- Admin SupplementK23HL143042 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LIN, MICHELLE P · 2019 to 2023
$1.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000140NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001862NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL143042NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA015831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveWe use a national emergency medicine clinical quality registry to describe recent trends in emergency department (ED) visitation overall and for select emergency conditions.

methodsData were drawn from the Clinical Emergency Department Registry, including 164 ED sites across 35 states participating in the registry with complete data from January 2019 through November 15, 2020. Overall ED visit counts, as well as specific emergency medical conditions identified by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification code (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, cardiac arrest/ventricular fibrillation, and venous thromboembolisms), were tabulated. We plotted biweekly visit counts overall and across specific geographic regions.

resultsThe largest declines in visit counts occurred early in the pandemic, with a nadir in April 46% lower than the 2019 monthly average. By November, overall ED visit counts had increased, but were 23% lower than prepandemic levels. The proportion of all ED visits that were for the select emergency conditions increased early in the pandemic; however, total visit counts for acute myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular disease have remained lower in 2020 compared with 2019. Despite considerable geographic and temporal variation in the trajectory of the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak, the overall pattern of ED visits observed was similar across regions and time.

conclusionThe persistent decline in ED visits for these time-sensitive emergency conditions raises the concern that coronavirus disease 2019 may continue to impede patients from seeking essential care. Efforts thus far to encourage individuals with concerning signs and symptoms to seek emergency care may not have been sufficient.

Indexed as

COVID-19EmergenciesEmergency Service, HospitalHeart ArrestHumansMyocardial InfarctionPatient Acceptance of Health CareRegistriesStrokeUnited StatesVenous Thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID33840512
PMCPMC7805390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.