Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33840510›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of emergency medicine2021

Emergency Department and Ambulatory Care Visits in the First Twelve Months of Coverage Under Medicaid Expansion: A Group-Based Trajectory Analysis.

Mara A G Hollander, Evan S Cole, Lindsay M Sabik, Jeremy M Kahn, Chung-Chou H Chang, Marian P Jarlenski, Julie M Donohue

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mara A G HollanderJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: mholla23@jhu.edu.
Evan S ColeDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA.
Lindsay M SabikDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA.
Jeremy M KahnDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Chung-Chou H ChangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA; Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Marian P JarlenskiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA.
Julie M DonohueDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA.
University of Pittsburgh · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Mental Health Services and Systems Training ProgramT32MH109436 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew Eisenberg, Elizabeth A. Stuart · 2017 to 2026
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH109436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveMore than 17 million people have gained health insurance coverage through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion. Few studies have examined heterogeneity within the Medicaid expansion population. We do so based on time-varying patterns of emergency department (ED) and ambulatory care use, and characterize diagnoses associated with ED and ambulatory care visits to evaluate whether certain diagnoses predominate in individual trajectories.

methodWe used group-based multitrajectory modeling to jointly estimate trajectories of ambulatory care and ED utilization in the first 12 months of enrollment among Pennsylvania Medicaid expansion enrollees from 2015 to 2017.

resultsAmong 601,877 expansion enrollees, we identified 6 distinct groups based on joint trajectories of ED and ambulatory care use. Mean ED use varied across groups from 3.4 to 48.7 visits per 100 enrollees in the first month and between 2.8 and 44.0 visits per 100 enrollees in month 12. Mean ambulatory visit rates varied from 0.0 to 179 visits per 100 enrollees in the first month and from 0.0 to 274 visits in month 12. Rates of ED visits did not change over time, but rates of ambulatory care visits increased by at least 50% among 4 groups during the study period. Groups varied on chronic condition diagnoses, including mental health and substance use disorders, as well as diagnoses associated with ambulatory care visits.

conclusionWe found substantial variation in rates of ED and ambulatory care use across empirically defined subgroups of Medicaid expansion enrollees. We also identified heterogeneity among the diagnoses associated with these visits. This data-driven approach may be used to target resources to encourage efficient use of ED services and support engagement with ambulatory care clinicians.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansInsurance CoverageMaleMedicaidPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActPennsylvaniaUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33840510
PMCPMC8238783
OpenAlexW3154200540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.