ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2023
Barriers to atrial fibrillation ablation during mitral valve surgery.
Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing mid-term outcomes of Cox-Maze procedure and pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation after concomitant mitral valve surgery: A systematic review.Journal of cardiac surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Evaluation of a Novel Multielectrode Surgical Pulsed Field Ablation Clamp: An Ex-Vivo Vegetal Study.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- National outcomes of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation at the time of mitral surgery.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation with concomitant cardiac surgery: a state-of-the-art review.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025Review
- Concomitant Surgical Ablation in Paroxysmal vs Persistent Atrial Fibrillation During Mitral Surgery.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Atrial Fibrillation Management During Surgical vs Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation is associated with improved survival compared with appendage obliteration alone: An analysis of 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024Article
- Concomitant Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Surgery and Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: History, Current Practice, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNearly 40% of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing mitral valve surgery do not receive concomitant ablation despite societal guidelines. We assessed barriers to implementation of this evidence-based practice through a survey of cardiac surgeons in 2 statewide quality collaboratives.
methodsAdult cardiac surgeons across 2 statewide collaboratives were surveyed on their knowledge and practice regarding AF ablation. Questions concerning experience, clinical practice, case scenarios, and barriers to implementation were included.
resultsAmong 66 respondents (66 of 135; 48.9%), the majority reported "very comfortable/frequently use" cryoablation (53 of 66; 80.3%) and radiofrequency (55 of 66; 83.3%). Only 12.1% (8/66) were not aware of the recommendations. Approximately one-half of the respondents reported learning AF ablation in fellowship (50.0%; 33 of 66) or attending courses (47.0%; 31 of 66). Responses to clinical scenarios demonstrated wide variability in practice patterns. One-half of the respondents reported no barriers; others cited increased cross-clamp time, excessive patient risk, and arrhythmia incidence as obstacles. Desired interventions included cardiology/electrophysiology support, protocols, pacemaker rate information, and education in the form of site visits, videos and proctors.
conclusionsKnowledge of evidence-based recommendations and practice patterns vary widely. These data identify several barriers to implementation of concomitant AF ablation and suggest specific interventions (mentorship/support, protocols, research, and education) to overcome these barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.