ArticleThe Hastings Center report2021
Antiracist Praxis in Public Health: A Call for Ethical Reflections.
Article in The Hastings Center report, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-American journal of public health · 2026Article
- Addressing Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Opioid Overdose Mortality: Strategies for Equitable Interventions and Structural Change.Current psychiatry reports · 2024Review
- Using cluster analysis to explore COVID-19 vaccine booster hesitancy by levels of medical mistrust in fully vaccinated US adults.Annals of medicine · 2024Article
- Commentary for Special Issue on Advancing Health Equity Among Black Communities: Implications for Research Funders (and Researchers).Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024Article
- Shaping undergraduate public health education through critical race theory: a case study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Addressing Anti-Black Racism in Bioethics: Responding to the Call.The Hastings Center report · 2022Article
- The Role of Medical Mistrust in Concerns about Tumor Genomic Profiling among Black and African American Cancer Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Centering Social Justice for Covid-19 Resources and Research.The Hastings Center report · 2021Article
- Improve the Quality of Life Related to HIV and the Black Community: HIV and AIDS Inequity in the Black Community: Proximal Solutions to Distal Determinants.Journal of healthcare, science and the humanities · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic has revealed myriad social, economic, and health inequities that disproportionately burden populations that have been made medically or socially vulnerable. Inspired by state and local governments that declared racism a public health crisis or emergency, the Anti-Racism in Public Health Act of 2020 reflects a shifting paradigm in which racism is considered a social determinant of health. Indeed, health inequities fundamentally rooted in structural racism have been exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic, which calls for the integration of antiracist praxis to promote ethical public health research processes. This commentary describes ways in which antiracist praxis-which emphasizes empowerment of traditionally marginalized populations-offers strategies to explicitly address power imbalance, stigmatization, and other consequences of structural racism in public health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.