Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33840036›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Assessment of arsenic exposure in the population of Sabalpur village of Saran District of Bihar with mitigation approach.

Arun Kumar, Rishav Kumar, Md Samiur Rahman, Mohammad Ali, Ranjit Kumar, Neha Nupur, Aman Gaurav, Vikram Raj, Gautam Anand, Pintoo Kumar Niraj and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Arun KumarMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Phulwarisharif, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India. drarunk31@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8946-5909
Rishav KumarMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Phulwarisharif, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India.
Md Samiur RahmanDepartment of Biotechnology, Anugrah Narayan College, Patna, Bihar, India.
Mohammad AliMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Phulwarisharif, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India.
Ranjit KumarDepartment of Animal Sciences, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, Pradesh, India.
Neha NupurMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Phulwarisharif, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India.
Aman GauravMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Phulwarisharif, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India.
Vikram RajMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Phulwarisharif, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India.
Gautam AnandMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Phulwarisharif, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India.
Pintoo Kumar NirajMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Phulwarisharif, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India.
Nirmal KumarMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Phulwarisharif, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India.
Abhinav SrivastavaMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Phulwarisharif, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India.
Akhouri BiswapriyaGeological Survey of India, Patna, Bihar, India.
Gyanendra Bahadur ChandDepartment of Zoology, Patna University, Patna, Bihar, India.
Dhruv KumarDepartment of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Tuhin RashmiDepartment of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Santosh KumarDepartment of Applied Geoscience and Engineering, Delft University of Technology|, Delft, The Netherlands.
Maiko SakamotoDepartment of International Studies, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 2778563, Japan.
Ashok Kumar GhoshMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Phulwarisharif, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India.
Mahavir Cancer Institute and Research Centre · INAmity University · INCentral University of Himachal Pradesh · INDelft University of Technology · NLGeological Survey of India · INNarayan Medical College and Hospital · INPatna University · INThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arsenic poisoning through groundwater is the world's greatest normal groundwater catastrophe which got an immense effect on worldwide general wellbeing. India is confronting the outcomes of arsenic poisoning in the zone of Ganga Brahmaputra alluvial plains. In Bihar, out of 38 districts, 18 districts are exceptionally influenced with groundwater arsenic defilement. In the present study, we have assessed the current situation of arsenic exposure in Sabalpur village of Saran district of Bihar after reporting of breast, renal, skin and thyroid cancer cases from this village along with typical symptoms of arsenicosis. Such cancer patients were identified at our institute and were taken for the study. The present investigation deals with the quantification of arsenic in groundwater, hair and nail samples of subjects as well as the survey of entire village to know the overall health status of the village people. A total of n=128 household handpump water samples as well as n=128 human hair and nail samples were collected from over n=520 households. Using the graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometer (GF-AAS), all the samples were analysed. The investigation resulted that the 61% of the analysed samples particularly the groundwater had the arsenic levels more than the permissible limit of WHO (> 10 μg/L) with 244.20 μg/L as the highest arsenic contamination in one of the handpump water sample. The exposure effect of hair sample was worst as 88% of all the collected samples were having high arsenic levels more than the permissible limit (> 0.2 mg/Kg). In case of nail samples, 92% of the samples were having high arsenic concentration more than the permissible limit (> 0.5 mg/Kg). The health survey study revealed high magnitude of disease burden in the exposed population with symptoms such as asthma, anaemia, hepatomegaly, diabetes, cardiac problem, skin fungal infections, breathlessness and mental disability. Few cancer cases of renal, skin, breast and cervix were also found among the exposed population of this village. The percentage of cancer cases in this village was 0.94% that was low, but it would be an aggravated situation in the near future if people will continue drinking arsenic-contaminated water. Therefore, a mitigation intervention was carried out in March 2020 by installing an arsenic filter plant. The health situation in the village in the present scenario is hope to improve in the coming years. However, motivation and awareness among the village population are still required.

Indexed as

ArsenicArsenic PoisoningGroundwaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalFemaleHumansIndiaPolyvinylsWater SupplyArsenicPolyvinylsSaranWater Pollutants, ChemicalArsenicosisCancerGroundwater contaminationHealth assessmentSabalpur (Bihar)

Identifiers

PMID33840036
OpenAlexW3126531654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.