Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33840020›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Do risk perceptions and constraints influence the adoption of climate change practices among small livestock herders in Punjab, Pakistan?

Muhammad Faisal, Xia Chunping, Azhar Abbas, Muhammad Haseeb Raza, Shoaib Akhtar, Muhammad Arslan Ajmal, Abdelrahman Ali

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Role of Trust in Disaster Risk Reduction: A Critical Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhammad FaisalCollege of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China.
Xia ChunpingCollege of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China. xcp@mail.hzau.edu.cn.
Azhar AbbasInstitute of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Haseeb RazaInstitute of Business Management Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Shoaib AkhtarCenter of Excellence for Olive Research & Training (CEFORT), Barani Agriculture Research Institute (BARI), Chakwal, Pakistan.
Muhammad Arslan AjmalDepartment of Economics, Government College University, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Abdelrahman AliCollege of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2662019FW018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change is severely damaging the agricultural system of many food producing regions worldwide. Small/subsistent livestock herders are the most vulnerable and less resilient group towards climatic disasters within South Asian region including Pakistan. The adoption of climate-smart practices would be beneficial for small livestock herders because of its potential to ensure food security, improve income, and sustain development simultaneously. The purpose of this paper is to investigate factors influencing small livestock herders' adaptation decisions towards changing climate by conducting field-based research. We intend to understand how institutional factors, risk perceptions, adaptations, and personal constraints affect the adaptation decisions related to climate change mitigation and choice of adaptation strategies. For this purpose, a primary data set of 405 small livestock herders from Punjab, Pakistan was used. The regression results of empirical models reveal the probability of adopting specific climate change strategies. The study results showed that zero adaptation (non-adoption) to climate change is higher when there is low literacy rate, less experience, nuclear family system, lack of institutional services, and low level of risk perception about climate change. The marginal outcome showed that the livestock herders with positive risk perception and access to the institutional services do participate more frequently in a higher number of adaptations options for economic and ecological benefits. Therefore, it is suggested that government and other development actors should strengthen institutions for trust building among local community groups and to reduce individuals' risks. Moreover, effective insurance schemes could facilitate small livestock herders to keep less but more productive livestock. The study recommends building viable and potential weather index insurance schemes which will result meaningful marginal scale benefits for smallholders. Finally, the results of major constraints suggest that it is necessary to provide awareness of climatic vulnerabilities, timely information delivery, and adequate financial facilities to offset resource constraints of livestock herders in order to adopt sustainable strategies at their farms.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeLivestockAgricultureAnimalsHumansPakistanPerceptionAdaptationsClimate changeInstitutional servicesRisk perceptions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.