ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
An asymmetric analysis of the impacts of energy use on carbon dioxide emissions in the G7 countries.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of environmental diplomacy and economic factors on environmental degradation.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Resilience in maize production for food security: Evaluating the role of climate-related abiotic stress in Pakistan.Heliyon · 2023Article
- On the asymmetric effects of insurance sector development on environmental quality: challenges and policy options for BRICS economies.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Estimating Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Profitability, and Greenhouse Gas Emission Using Different Methods of Fertilization.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The foremost theme of the paper is to explore the asymmetric/symmetric impact of energy consumption on the carbon dioxide emission of G7 countries (Germany, Canada, USA, Italy, France, Italy, UK, and Japan). The nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag is used to measure asymmetric/symmetric cointegration by using annual data of G7 countries from 1965 to 2019. The augmented Dickey-Fuller and structural break unit root test is employed to measure the stationarity in variables while the Brock, Dechert, and Scheinkman test is used for measuring nonlinearity and the Wald test is used to figure out short- and long-run asymmetries/symmetries, respectively. The estimated findings of the nonlinear autoregressive distribution lag model show a significant effect of energy use on the ecological footprint. The asymmetric causality test provides evidence of unidirectional, bidirectional, and asymmetrical/symmetrical causality among the variables of G7 nations. The finding of the study suggested policy for the government of Canada and France to use coal instead of oil and gas while the USA, Germany, Italy, UK, and Japan are required to consume gas as compared to oil and coal. Similarly, the study also suggests using modern technology, renewable energy, and preventive measurement for ensuring environmental betterment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.