ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2021
Review of biomarker systems as an alternative for early diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma.
Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Evolving Landscape of Ovarian Cancer: Innovations in Biotechnology and Artificial Intelligence- Based Screening and Treatment.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
- Effects of Clinical Covariates on Serum miRNA Expression among Women without Ovarian Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025Article
- A diagnostic scoring system for differentiating between benign and malignant cystic ovarian tumors, utilizing imaging features and biomarkers.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Performance of IOTA Simple Rules Risks, ADNEX Model, Subjective Assessment Compared to CA125 and HE4 with ROMA Algorithm in Discriminating between Benign, Borderline and Stage I Malignant Adnexal Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- PCDH17 gene promoter methylation status in a cohort of Egyptian women with epithelial ovarian cancer.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Molecular Management of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma is bound to boost the long-term endurance rate of the patients. Most ovarian tumors happen post menopause when the ovaries have no vital operation and therefore irregular ovarian role causes no signs. According to Muinao T. et al. (Heliyon. 5(12):e02826, 2019), if we consider the frequency of ovarian carcinoma to be moderate, a screening technique must accomplish a base specificity of 99.6% and sensitivity of over 75%. The classification and approval of early diagnostic biomarkers explicit to ovarian carcinoma are essentially required. Prevailing methods for early diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma incorporate TVS, biological marker examination, or a blend of the two or other. In recent years, it has been revealed that a combination of at least two biomarkers has beaten single biomarkers in measures for early diagnosis of the illness. In the present document, we survey the ongoing exploration of innovative characteristic methodologies and possible panels of carcinoma biological markers for the early diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma and discuss biomarkers as the plausible apparatus for model improvement and other progressed approaches as an effective alternative to the prevailing methods for early diagnosis of this dreadful disease to evade bogus analysis and inordinate expense.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.