Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33839965›Full record

SynthesisThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2021

Economic evidence with respect to cost-effectiveness of the transitional care model among geriatric patients discharged from hospital to home: a systematic review.

Kristina Kast, Carl-Philipp Wachter, Oliver Schöffski, Martina Rimmele

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Transitional discharge interventions for people with schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristina KastChair of Health Care Management, Law and Economics Faculty of the Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany. kristina.kast@fau.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9470-1219
Carl-Philipp WachterChair of Health Care Management, Law and Economics Faculty of the Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany.
Oliver SchöffskiChair of Health Care Management, Law and Economics Faculty of the Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany.
Martina RimmeleMedical Faculty of the Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Biomedicine of Aging, Kobergerstr. 60, 90408, Nuremberg, Germany.

Funding

Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) 01NVF17005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe German hospital-to-home discharge management of geriatric patients has long been criticized. The implementation of the American Transitional Care Model (TCM) could help to reduce readmissions and costs. The objective of this review was to check the scientific evidence of the cost-effectiveness of the TCM.

methodsA systematic literature search in six databases for the time period of 26 years was conducted. The studies had to meet all pre-defined inclusion criteria. The data extraction is based on a criteria chart from literature. The methodological quality was assessed using the tools of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute as well as the Consensus Health Economic Criteria list. The results transferability to German health care system was explained based on the criteria from the literature.

resultsThree American studies met all criteria. They showed partial cost analyses but no full economic analyses. It could be assumed that the economic effect of the TCM changes over time. The costs of a care coordinator could not be determined because few detailed information was reported. The TCM may have negative consequences for hospitals. The results are not transferable to Germany.

conclusionThere is no scientific evidence for the cost-effectiveness of the defined TCM. The optimal TCM duration still needs to be clarified. A detailed overview with units and prices and an additional consideration of the hospital perspective could help to make the information more transparent when deciding about the TCM implementation. A full economic analysis under German conditions or for similar European countries is necessary.

Indexed as

Patient DischargeTransitional CareAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareHospitalsHumansUnited StatesBudget impact analysisCost-effectivenessEconomic analysisGeriatric patientsHospital dischargeTransitional care

Identifiers

PMID33839965
PMCPMC8275561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.