Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33839926›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2021

Osteoid osteoma: which is the best mininvasive treatment option?

Anna Parmeggiani, Claudia Martella, Luca Ceccarelli, Marco Miceli, Paolo Spinnato, Giancarlo Facchini

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Musculoskeletal Intervention in Children: An Update.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna ParmeggianiDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G.C.Pupilli, 1-40136, Bologna, Italy. anna.parmeggiani2@studio.unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7960-5544
Claudia MartellaDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G.C.Pupilli, 1-40136, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3424-5308
Luca CeccarelliDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G.C.Pupilli, 1-40136, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0510-0970
Marco MiceliDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G.C.Pupilli, 1-40136, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8714-8053
Paolo SpinnatoDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G.C.Pupilli, 1-40136, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6060-3215
Giancarlo FacchiniDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G.C.Pupilli, 1-40136, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6739-7335
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoid osteoma is the third most common benign bone tumor, with well-known clinical presentation and radiological features. Although surgical excision has been the only therapeutic option for a long time, to date it has been replaced by minimally invasive techniques, which proved satisfactory success rates and low complication occurrence. Therefore, the purpose of this literature review was to describe the main updates of these recent procedures in the field of interventional radiology, with particular attention paid to the results of the leading studies relating to the efficacy, complications, and recurrence rate. Nevertheless, this study aimed to analyze the peculiarities of each reported technique, with specific focus on the possible improvements and pitfalls. Results proved that all mininvasive procedures boast a high success rate with slight number of complications and a low recurrence rate. Radiofrequency ablation is still considered the gold standard procedure for percutaneous treatment of osteoid osteoma, and it has the possibility to combine treatment with a biopsy. Interstitial laser ablation's advantages are the simplicity of use and a lower cost of the electrodes, while cryoablation allows real-time visualization of the ablated zone, increasing the treatment safety. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery is the most innovative non-invasive procedure, with the unquestionable advantage to be radiation free.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsCatheter AblationHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationOsteoma, OsteoidHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiology, InterventionalTreatment OutcomeAblation techniquesInterventionalMagnetic resonance imagingOsteoidOsteomaRadiography

Identifiers

PMID33839926
PMCPMC8578134
OpenAlexW3156305146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.