Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33839901›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2021

Insights into the epidemiology of infant hydrocephalus.

Mandeep S Tamber

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Global disparities in pediatric neurosurgery research: a 20-year bibliometric analysis by country income group.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Paediatric hydrocephalus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mandeep S TamberDivision of Neurosurgery, British Columbia Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Suite K3-159, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3V4, Canada. mandeep.tamber@cw.bc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3329-1011
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInfant hydrocephalus represents an important public health issue. Recent analysis of registry-based data has improved our understanding of the variable epidemiology of infant hydrocephalus around the world and the consequent burden of disease that this vulnerable population must carry throughout their lifetimes. The purpose of this article is to review the epidemiology of infant hydrocephalus, highlighting the ways in which analysis of prospectively collected registry data has contributed to our current knowledge and how similar methods may lead to new discovery. DISCUSSION: Congenital abnormalities and spina bifida-associated hydrocephalus, along with acquired postnatal hydrocephalus secondary to intraventricular hemorrhage of prematurity and infection, represent the most common etiologies of infant hydrocephalus, with their relative prevalence dependent on geographic region and socioeconomic status. Best current estimates suggest that the incidence of congenital and acquired infant hydrocephalus may be between 80 and 125 cases/100,000 births depending on world region. These incidence figures and their forecasts, together with improved survival associated with promptly diagnosed and treated hydrocephalus, suggest that the burden of hydrocephalus, as measured by prevalence, is primed to increase. Counterbalancing these statistics is evidence that perhaps, in some regions, improvements in neurosurgical and general perinatal care, as well as shifting indications for initial surgical intervention in these infants (and therefore in the very definition of hydrocephalus itself), the number of infants who require first time surgical treatment for hydrocephalus, may be decreasing. Further longitudinal data collection will undoubtedly assist in determining whether these trends are robust.

conclusionWhen one takes a global perspective, complexities related to the underlying epidemiology of infant hydrocephalus become abundantly clear. The causes of infant hydrocephalus vary from one world region to another, largely related to the underlying income characteristics of the population. Likewise, increased birth rates in low-income areas of the world are likely to result in an increased incidence and prevalence of infant hydrocephalus in those regions, whereas sophisticated and resource-intensive advancements in perinatal care available in other regions may result in decreased epidemiological estimates of disease burden in others. Further analysis of high-quality registry-based data may help clarify these issues.

Indexed as

HydrocephalusInfant, Premature, DiseasesSpinal DysraphismFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyPrevalenceEpidemiologyHydrocephalusInfantRegistries

Identifiers

PMID33839901
OpenAlexW3152796074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.