Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33839264›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2021

Inference of brain networks with approximate Bayesian computation - assessing face validity with an example application in Parkinsonism.

Timothy O West, Luc Berthouze, Simon F Farmer, Hayriye Cagnan, Vladimir Litvak

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Timothy O WestNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom; Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TH, United Kingdom; Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom. Electronic address: timothy.west@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.
Luc BerthouzeCentre for Computational Neuroscience and Robotics, University of Sussex, Falmer, United Kingdom; UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Guildford St., London WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom.
Simon F FarmerDepartment of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom; Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, UCL, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
Hayriye CagnanNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom; Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TH, United Kingdom; Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
Vladimir LitvakWellcome Trust Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/R020418/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 539208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes and validates a novel framework using the Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) algorithm for parameter estimation and model selection in models of mesoscale brain network activity. We provide a proof of principle, first pass validation of this framework using a set of neural mass models of the cortico-basal ganglia thalamic circuit inverted upon spectral features from experimental, in vivo recordings. This optimization scheme relaxes an assumption of fixed-form posteriors (i.e. the Laplace approximation) taken in previous approaches to inverse modelling of spectral features. This enables the exploration of model dynamics beyond that approximated from local linearity assumptions and so fit to explicit, numerical solutions of the underlying non-linear system of equations. In this first paper, we establish a face validation of the optimization procedures in terms of: (i) the ability to approximate posterior densities over parameters that are plausible given the known causes of the data; (ii) the ability of the model comparison procedures to yield posterior model probabilities that can identify the model structure known to generate the data; and (iii) the robustness of these procedures to local minima in the face of different starting conditions. Finally, as an illustrative application we show (iv) that model comparison can yield plausible conclusions given the known neurobiology of the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic circuit in Parkinsonism. These results lay the groundwork for future studies utilizing highly nonlinear or brittle models that can explain time dependant dynamics, such as oscillatory bursts, in terms of the underlying neural circuits.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, TheoreticalAnimalsBasal GangliaBayes TheoremCerebral CortexComputer SimulationConnectomeDisease Models, AnimalElectrocorticographyMaleNerve NetNeuroimagingParkinsonian DisordersProof of Concept StudyRatsBrain dynamicsCircuitsInverse modellingNetworksOscillationsParkinsonism

Identifiers

PMID33839264
PMCPMC8270890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.