Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33839191›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2021

Computational framework for investigating predictive processing in auditory perception.

Benjamin Skerritt-Davis, Mounya Elhilali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Robust Anomaly Detection of Adventitious Auscultation Signals using Bayesian Belief Tracking.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin Skerritt-DavisJohns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mounya ElhilaliJohns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: mounya@jhu.edu.

Funding

Multiscale modeling of the cocktail party problemU01AG058532 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ELHILALI, MOUNYA · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
Smart stethoscope for monitoring and diagnosis of lung diseasesR01HL133043 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ELHILALI, MOUNYA · 2016 to 2019
$2.3M
Multi-feature predictive processing of stochastic sounds in the human auditory systemF31DC017629 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SKERRITT-DAVIS, BENJAMIN · 2019 to 2020
$85k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133043NIA NIH HHS U01 AG058532NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC017629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe brain tracks sound sources as they evolve in time, collecting contextual information to predict future sensory inputs. Previous work in predictive coding typically focuses on the perception of predictable stimuli, leaving the implementation of these same neural processes in more complex, real-world environments containing randomness and uncertainty up for debate. NEW

methodTo facilitate investigation into the perception of less tightly-controlled listening scenarios, we present a computational model as a tool to ask targeted questions about the underlying predictive processes that connect complex sensory inputs to listener behavior and neural responses. In the modeling framework, observed sound features (e.g. pitch) are tracked sequentially using Bayesian inference. Sufficient statistics are inferred from past observations at multiple time scales and used to make predictions about future observation while tracking the statistical structure of the sensory input.

resultsFacets of the model are discussed in terms of their application to perceptual research, and examples taken from real-world audio demonstrate the model's flexibility to capture a variety of statistical structures along various perceptual dimensions. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodsPrevious models are often targeted toward interpreting a particular experimental paradigm (e.g., oddball paradigm), perceptual dimension (e.g., pitch processing), or task (e.g., speech segregation), thus limiting their ability to generalize to other domains. The presented model is designed as a flexible and practical tool for broad application.

conclusionThe model is presented as a general framework for generating new hypotheses and guiding investigation into the neural processes underlying predictive coding of complex scenes.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionSoundAttentionBayes TheoremSpeechBayesian inferenceneural decodingPredictive codingStatistical inferenceuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID33839191
PMCPMC9017011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.