ArticleThe Lancet. Planetary health2021
Planetary healthy publics after COVID-19.
Article in The Lancet. Planetary health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Ecological Genome Project and the Promises of Ecogenomics for Society: Realising a Shared Vision as One Health.Bioethics · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitudes and practices related to health and well-being in a forest fringe community in southern India.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Spanish residents' experiences of care during the first wave of the COVID-19 syndemic: a photo-elicitation study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023Article
- Measuring Fertility Intentions During Times of Crisis: An Example Using Survey Data Amid the Covid-19 Pandemic.Studies in family planning · 2023Article
- What is next for occupational cancer epidemiology?Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2022Article
- Beyond global health: Redefining the 'public' in public health.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2022Article
- The effects of COVID-19 transmission on environmental sustainability and human health: Paving the way to ensure its sustainable management.The Science of the total environment · 2022Review
- Adding a One Health approach to a research framework for minority health and health disparities.eLife · 2022Article
- Diversity regained: Precautionary approaches to COVID-19 as a phenomenon of the total environment.The Science of the total environment · 2022Article
- Humanitarian inversions: COVID-19 as crisis.Transactions (Institute of British Geographers : 1965) · 2022Article
- Understanding antibiotic use: practices, structures and networks.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2021Review
- The Breathing Catastrophe: COVID-19 and Global Health Governance.Development (Society for International Development) · 2021Article
- "What should be computed" for supporting post-pandemic recovery policymaking? A life-oriented perspective.Computational urban science · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
COVID-19 is a sign of a global malaise. The pandemic is an outcome of what we term a planetary dysbiosis, for which underlining drivers include inequality and the exploitation and extraction of human and non-human labours. The implication is that the usual fixes to outbreaks of infectious diseases (ie, surveillance, pharmaceutical measures, and non-pharmaceutical measures) will be insufficient without a thorough reappraisal of and investment in planetary health. Given the heterogeneity and diversity of environments and populations, we envisage these actions as a matter for the generation of new kinds of public, requiring widespread and multiple forms of engagement to generate lasting solutions. We use and extend the concept of healthy publics to suggest a movement that can start to reclaim planetary health as a collective and ongoing issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.