Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33838558›Full record

ArticleValue in health regional issues2021

Addressing Challenges in Health Technology Assessment Institutionalization for Furtherance of Universal Health Coverage Through South-South Knowledge Exchange: Lessons From Bhutan, Kenya, Thailand, and Zambia.

Taeyoung Kim, Manushi Sharma, Yot Teerawattananon, Cecilia Oh, Leslie Ong, Peter Hangoma, Deepika Adhikari, Pempa Pempa, Angela Kairu, Stacey Orangi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Value in health regional issues, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Health technology assessment in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: an updated SWOT analysis.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A systematic assessment of the demand for HTA hub services in Asia.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Health technology assessment capacity to support Zambia's health benefits package reform policy.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025
    Article
  17. A framework for improved collaboration on HTA in the Asia-Pacific region: a role for HTAsiaLink.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Taeyoung KimHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Manushi SharmaHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Yot TeerawattananonHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Nonthaburi, Thailand; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Cecilia OhHIV, Health and Development Team, United Nations Development Programme, Bangkok, Thailand.
Leslie OngHIV, Health and Development Team, United Nations Development Programme, Bangkok, Thailand.
Peter HangomaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Deepika AdhikariEssential Medicines and Technology Division, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Health, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Pempa PempaEssential Medicines and Technology Division, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Health, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Angela KairuHealth Economics Research Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Stacey OrangiHealth Economics Research Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Saudamini Vishwanath DabakHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Nonthaburi, Thailand. Electronic address: saudamini.d@hitap.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health Technology Assessment (HTA), a tool for priority setting, has emerged as a means of ensuring the sustainability of a Universal Health Coverage (UHC) system. However, setting up an effective HTA system poses multiple challenges and knowledge exchange can play a crucial role in helping countries achieve their UHC targets. This article reports the results of the discussion during a preconference session at the 2019 HTAsiaLink Conference, an annual gathering of HTA agencies in Asia, which supports knowledge transfer and exchange among HTA practitioners. As part of this discourse, 3 main HTA challenges were identified based on experiences of selected countries in Asia and Africa, namely Bhutan, Kenya, Thailand, and Zambia: availability of funding, building technical capacity, and achieving buy-in among stakeholders for successful translation of HTA research into UHC policy. The potential solutions identified through this South-South engagement included establishing a legal mandate for HTA, building local technical capacity through partnerships and enhancing strategic communication with stakeholders to increase awareness, among others. South-South Knowledge Exchange can therefore be instrumental in sharing lessons learned from common challenges and offer potential solutions to address capacity building initiatives for HTA in LMICs.

Indexed as

Technology Assessment, BiomedicalUniversal Health InsuranceBhutanHumansInstitutionalizationKenyaThailandZambiahealth technology assessmentlow- and middle-income countriespublic health policySouth-South knowledge exchangeuniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID33838558
PMCPMC8163602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.