Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33838232›Full record

ArticleAnnals of vascular surgery2021

Feasibility and acceptability of virtual mock oral examinations for senior vascular surgery trainees and implications for the certifying exam.

Mark S Zemela, Rafael D Malgor, Brigitte K Smith, Matthew R Smeds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of vascular surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Virtual OSCE examinations during COVID-19 A 360 satisfaction assessment from examiners and candidates.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Article
  5. Cross-institutional Virtual Mock Oral Examination: A New Paradigm?Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023
    Article
  6. The silver lining of the pandemic in surgical education: virtual surgical education and recommendations for best practices.Global surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark S ZemelaSaint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.
Rafael D MalgorDivision of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Brigitte K SmithDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Matthew R SmedsDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO. Electronic address: mark.zemela@health.slu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the cancellation of in-person testing across the country. We sought to understand the feasibility of conducting virtual oral examinations as well as solicit opinions of vascular surgery program directors (PD) regarding the use of virtual platforms to conduct both low stakes mock oral examinations with their trainees and potentially "real" high stakes certifying examinations (CE) moving forward.

methodsForty-four senior vascular surgery trainees from 17 institutions took part in a virtual mock oral examination conducted by 38 practicing vascular surgeons via Zoom. Each examination lasted 30 minutes with four clinical scenarios. An anonymous survey pertaining to the conduct of the examination and opinions on feasibility of using virtual examinations for the vascular surgery CE was sent to all examiners and examinees. A similar survey was sent to all vascular surgery program directors.

resultsThe overall pass rate was 82% (36/44 participants) with no correlation with training paradigm. 32/44 (73%) of trainees, 29/38 (76%) of examiners and 49/103 (48%) of PDs completed the surveys. Examinees and examiners thought the experience was beneficial and PDs also thought the experience would be beneficial for their trainees. While the majority of trainees and examiners believed they were able to communicate and express (or evaluate) knowledge and confidence as easily virtually as in person, PDs were less likely to agree confidence could be assessed virtually. The majority of respondents thought the CE of the Vascular Surgery Board of the American Board of Surgery could be offered virtually, although no groups thought virtual exams were superior to in person exams. While cost benefit was perceived in virtual examinations, the security of the examination was a concern.

conclusionsPerforming virtual mock oral examinations for vascular surgery trainees is feasible. Both vascular surgery trainees as well as PDs feel that virtual CEs should be considered by the Vascular Surgery Board.

Indexed as

CertificationCOVID-19Educational MeasurementEducation, Medical, GraduateInternship and ResidencyClinical CompetenceEducational StatusFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurgeonsSurveys and QuestionnairesTest Taking SkillsVascular Surgical ProceduresVerbal BehaviorEducationMock OralsRemoteVascular SurgeryVirtual

Identifiers

PMID33838232
PMCPMC8579692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.