Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33837949›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2021

Laparoscopic splenectomy as a definitive management option for high-grade traumatic splenic injury when non operative management is not feasible or failed: a 5-year experience from a level one trauma center with minimally invasive surgery expertise.

Arianna Birindelli, Matthew Martin, Mansoor Khan, Gaetano Gallo, Edoardo Segalini, Alice Gori, Amy Yetasook, Mauro Podda, Antonio Giuliani, Gregorio Tugnoli and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 3 countries.

Arianna Birindelli *Department of Surgery, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Matthew MartinDepartment of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA.
Mansoor KhanDigestive Diseases Department, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK.
Gaetano GalloUniversity of Magna Grecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Edoardo SegaliniDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, ASST, Crema, CR, Italy.
Alice GoriDepartment of Surgery, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Amy YetasookHarbor-UCLA Department of Surgery, Torrence, CA, USA.
Mauro PoddaEmergency and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital, Cagliari, Italy.
Antonio GiulianiGeneral and Emergency Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Regionale San Carlo, Potenza, Italy.
Gregorio TugnoliTrauma Surgery Unit, Emergency Department, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Robert LimDepartment of Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Tripler, Honolulu, HI, USA.
TraumaLap Study Group
Salomone Di Saverio *Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK. salo75@inwind.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5685-5022
Azienda Ospedaliera Carlo Poma · ITUniversity of Insubria · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Maggiore · ITCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBMagna Graecia University · ITScripps Mercy Hospital · USTripler Army Medical Center · USUCLA Medical Center · USUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Cagliari · ITValve (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technique, indications and outcomes of laparoscopic splenectomy in stable trauma patients have not been well described yet. All hemodynamically non-compromised abdominal trauma patients who underwent splenectomy from 1/2013 to 12/2017 at our Level 1 trauma center were included. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analysed with per-protocol and an intention-to-treat comparison between open vs laparoscopic groups. 49 splenectomies were performed (16 laparoscopic, 33 open). Among the laparoscopic group, 81% were successfully completed laparoscopically. Laparoscopy was associated with a higher incidence of concomitant surgical procedures (p 0.016), longer operative times, but a significantly faster return of bowel function and oral diet without reoperations. No significant differences were demonstrated in morbidity, mortality, length of stay, or long-term complications, although laparoscopic had lower surgical site infection (0 vs 21%).The isolated splenic injury sub-analysis included 25 splenectomies,76% (19) open and 24% (6) laparoscopic and confirmed reduction in post-operative morbidity (40 vs 57%), blood transfusion (0 vs 48%), ICU admission (20 vs 57%) and overall LOS (7 vs 9 days) in the laparoscopic group. Laparoscopic splenectomy is a safe and effective technique for hemodynamically stable patients with splenic trauma and may represent an advantageous alternative to open splenectomy in terms of post-operative recovery and morbidity.

Indexed as

LaparoscopySplenectomyHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTrauma CentersTreatment OutcomeAbdominal traumaAcute care surgeryAngio-embolizationBlunt abdominal traumaEmergency laparoscopyHemodynamic stabilityLaparoscopic splenectomyMinimally invasive trauma surgeryNon-operative managementPenetrating abdominal traumaTrauma centerTrauma laparoscopyTrauma surgery

Identifiers

PMID33837949
PMCPMC8397689
OpenAlexW3150644263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.