ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2022
Clinical evaluation of a novel subcutaneous lactate monitor.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effectiveness of Prehospital Subcutaneous Continuous Lactate Monitoring in Adult Trauma: A Systematic Review.Prehospital and disaster medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Pharmacokinetics and metabolic effects of ketone monoester supplementation: The first simultaneous CKM and CGM study under normal diet and activities.Metabolism open · 2025Article
- The Challenges of Postoperative Tissue Flap Vitality Monitoring in Obese Individuals.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Peroxidase-like Nanoparticles of Noble Metals Stimulate Increasing Sensitivity of FlavocytochromeBiosensors · 2024Article
- Flap Monitoring Techniques: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Strengths and Challenges of Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery During Exercise in People With Type 1 Diabetes: Potential Future Directions.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Article
- The combination of lactate level, lactate clearance and APACHE II score better predicts short-term outcomes in critically Ill patients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2022Article
- Transcutaneous Flexible Sensor forACS sensors · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Lactate levels are commonly used as an indirect measure to assess metabolic stress in clinical conditions like sepsis. Dynamic lactate measurements are recommended to assess and guide treatment in patients with shock and other critical care conditions. A minimally invasive, continuous lactate monitor has potential to improve clinical decisions and patient care. The purpose of the study was to evaluate continuous lactate measurements of a novel enzymatic Continuous Lactate Monitor (CLM) developed in our laboratory. Lactate levels were monitored during incremental cycling exercise challenges as a tool for hyperlactatemia. Six healthy individuals 18-45 y/o (4 males, 2 females) participated in the study. CLM devices were inserted subcutaneously in the postero-lateral trunk below the renal angle, one hour before the exercise challenge. Each exercise challenge consisted of a 3 to 12-min warm up period, followed by up to 7, 4-min incremental workload bouts separated by rest intervals. Continuous lactate measurements obtained from CLM were compared with commercial lactate analyzer (Abbott iSTAT) measurements of venous blood (plasma) drawn from the antecubital vein. Blood was drawn at up to 25 time points spanning the duration of before exercise, during exercise, and up to 120 min post exercise. Area under the curve (AUC), and delay time were calculated to compare the CLM readings with plasma lactate concentration. Average plasma lactate concentration increased from 1.02 to 16.21 mM. Ratio of AUC derived from CLM to plasma lactate was 1.025 (0.990-1.058). Average dynamic delay time of CLM to venous plasma lactate was 5.22 min (2.87-10.35). Insertion sites examined 48 h after CLM removal did not show signs of side effects and none required medical attention upon examination. The newly developed CLM has shown to be a promising tool to continuously measure lactate concentration in a minimally invasive fashion. Results indicate the CLM can provide needed trends in lactate over time. Such a device may be used in the future to improve treatment in clinical conditions such as sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.