ArticleMolecular biology reports2021
Induction of resistance to sugarcane mosaic virus by RNA interference targeting coat protein gene silencing in transgenic sugarcane.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sugarcane Breeding in the Genomic Era: Integrative Strategies and Emerging Technologies.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development of Immunodetection Systems Using a Specific Antibody Against the Recombinant Coat Protein for Detecting Sugarcane Streak Mosaic Virus.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- RNA silencing: the future potential strategy for engineering virus resistance in plants.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025Review
- RNAi and genome editing of sugarcane: Progress and prospects.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Enhancing quality and climate resilient traits in vegetatively propagated polyploids: transgenic and genome editing advancements, challenges and future directions.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Genetic Engineering for Enhancing Sugarcane Tolerance to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Tweaking the Small Non-Coding RNAs to Improve Desirable Traits in Plant.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Enhancement of healthful novel sugar contents in genetically engineered sugarcane juice integrated with molecularly characterized ThSyGII (CEMB-SIG2).Scientific reports · 2022Article
- RNA interference and crop protection against biotic stresses.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021Review
- Sugarcane Mosaic Disease: Characteristics, Identification and Control.Microorganisms · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV) is a serious disease of monocotyledonous plants, including sugarcane, causing deterioration in both growth and productivity. RNA interference (RNAi) inhibits gene expression through RNA-mediated sequence-specific interactions and is considered an effective approach to control viral infection in plants. In this study, the SCMVCp gene encoding the coat protein (CP) was inserted into the pGreen-0179 plasmid in both sense and antisense orientations. Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) and Zea mays ubiquitin (Ubi) promoters were selected to drive the transcription of the intron-hairpin constructs, called HpSCMVCp-CaMV and HpSCMVCp-Ubi, respectively. Transgenic sugarcane expressing these constructs was generated through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. This transformation method produced a high percentage of transgenic plants for both HpSCMVCp-CaMV and HpSCMVCp-Ubi, as confirmed by PCR analysis. Southern blotting revealed a single stable insertion of the DNA target in the genome of transgenic sugarcane lines. After artificial virus infection, lines that developed mosaic symptoms were classified as susceptible, whereas those that remained green without symptoms were classified as resistant at 42 days post-inoculation. Immunoblotting revealed CP expression at 37 kDa in susceptible and non-transgenic sugarcane, but not in resistant lines. RT-PCR analysis confirmed viral Cp and Nib gene expression in susceptible lines and their absence in resistant lines. Interestingly, upon comparison of effectivity, CaMV and Ubi promoter-driven gene expression resulted in 57.69% and 82.35% resistant sugarcane lines, respectively. Thus, we concluded that RNAi is effective for inducing resistance against SCMV and that the Ubi promoter is an effective promoter for producing transgenic sugarcane.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.