Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33837883›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2021

Inguinal hernia repair in Spain. A population-based study of 263,283 patients: factors associated with the choice of laparoscopic approach.

S Guillaumes, C Hoyuela, N J Hidalgo, M Juvany, I Bachero, J Ardid, A Martrat, M Trias

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Outpatient treatment for hernia surgery in Germany].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S GuillaumesDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Plató, c/ Plató 21, 08006, Barcelona, Spain. sguillaumes@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8251-6171
C HoyuelaDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Plató, c/ Plató 21, 08006, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6539-0439
N J HidalgoDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Plató, c/ Plató 21, 08006, Barcelona, Spain.
M JuvanyDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Plató, c/ Plató 21, 08006, Barcelona, Spain.
I BacheroDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Plató, c/ Plató 21, 08006, Barcelona, Spain.
J ArdidDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Plató, c/ Plató 21, 08006, Barcelona, Spain.
A MartratDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Plató, c/ Plató 21, 08006, Barcelona, Spain.
M TriasDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Plató, c/ Plató 21, 08006, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this study is to evaluate the laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (IHR) rate in Spain and identify the factors associated with the choice of this surgical approach.

methodsA retrospective cohort study of 263,283 patients who underwent IHR from January 2016 to December 2018 was conducted. Data were extracted from the Spanish Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) of the Health Ministry database. The primary outcome was laparoscopic (LAP) rate utilization. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to identify factors associated with LAP-IHR.

resultsOnly 5.7% (15,059) patients underwent LAP-IHR, whereas the remnant 94.3% (248,224 patients) underwent open repair. High variability in the LAP-IHR rate across the country was observed; ranged between provinces from 0 to 19.7%, for a unilateral hernia, and between 0 to 57.4% in the case of bilateral hernias. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the patient place of residence was the most remarkable factor associated with the likelihood of receiving LAP-IHR (OR 4.96; p < 0.001). There were also significant differences favoring LAP-IHR for bilateral operation (OR 4.596; p < 0.001), insurance coverage (OR 4.439, p < 0.001) and self-pay patients (OR 2.317; p < 0.001), as well as a recurrent hernia (OR 1.780; p < 0.001), age younger than 65 years (OR 1.555; p < 0.001) and male sex (OR 1.162, p < 0.001).

conclusionLAP-IHR remains a not frequent choice among surgeons in Spain, even when dealing with recurrent and bilateral hernias. The results suggest that the choice of LAP-IHR could depend on the surgeon's preference rather than on the indication appropriateness.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalLaparoscopyAgedFemaleHerniorrhaphyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSpainAbdominal wall surgeryHerniaHernioplastyInguinal hernia repairLaparoscopyMinimally invasive surgerySurgical training

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.