Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33837861›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2021

An international tool to measure perceived stressors in intensive care units: the PS-ICU scale.

Alexandra Laurent, Alicia Fournier, Florent Lheureux, Maria Cruz Martin Delgado, Maria G Bocci, Alessia Prestifilippo, Pierre Aslanian, Julie Henriques, Sophie Paget-Bailly, Jean-Michel Constantin and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Alexandra LaurentPsy-DREPI Laboratory EA 7458, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France. alexandra.laurent@u-bourgogne.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8982-1803
Alicia FournierPsy-DREPI Laboratory EA 7458, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-5982
Florent LheureuxLaboratory of Psychology EA3188, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté,, Dijon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1740-0356
Maria Cruz Martin DelgadoHospital Universitario de Torrejón, Intensive Care Unit, Madrid, Spain.
Maria G BocciDipartimento di Scienze dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e della Rianimazione, Rome, Italy.
Alessia PrestifilippoFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Pierre AslanianIntensive Care Unit of Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Julie HenriquesMethodology and Quality of Life in Oncology Unit (INSERM UMR 1098), University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Sophie Paget-BaillyMethodology and Quality of Life in Oncology Unit (INSERM UMR 1098), University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Jean-Michel ConstantinDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM, Paris, France.
Guillaume BeschDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Besançon, University of Franche-Comte EA3920, Besançon, France.
Jean-Pierre QuenotService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, University Hospital of Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Amelie AnotaMethodology and Quality of Life in Oncology Unit (INSERM UMR 1098), University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Belaid BouhemadDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital of Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Gilles CapellierMedical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Besançon, University of Franche-Comte EA 3920, Besançon, France.
Inserm · FRAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITCHU Dijon Bourgogne · FRCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversidad Francisco de Vitoria · ESUniversité Bourgogne Franche-Comté · FRUniversité de Bourgogne · FRUniversité de franche-comté · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe intensive care unit is increasingly recognized as a stressful environment for healthcare professionals. This context has an impact on the health of these professionals but also on the quality of their personal and professional life. However, there is currently no validated scale to measure specific stressors perceived by healthcare professionals in intensive care. The aim of this study was to construct and validate in three languages a perceived stressors scale more specific to intensive care units (ICU).

resultsWe conducted a three-phase study between 2016 and 2019: (1) identification of stressors based on the verbatim of 165 nurses and physicians from 4 countries (Canada, France, Italy, and Spain). We identified 99 stressors, including those common to most healthcare professions (called generic), as well as stressors more specific to ICU professionals (called specific); (2) item elaboration and selection by a panel of interdisciplinary experts to build a provisional 99-item version of the scale. This version was pre-tested with 70 professionals in the 4 countries and enabled us to select 50 relevant items; (3) test of the validity of the scale in 497 ICU healthcare professionals. Factor analyses identified six dimensions: lack of fit with families and organizational functioning; patient- and family-related emotional load; complex/at risk situations and skill-related issues; workload and human resource management issues; difficulties related to team working; and suboptimal care situations. Correlations of the PS-ICU scale with a generic stressors measure (i.e., the Job Content Questionnaire) tested its convergent validity, while its correlations with the Maslach Burnout Inventory-HSS examined its concurrent validity. We also assessed the test-retest reliability of PS-ICU with intraclass correlation coefficients.

conclusionsThe perceived stressors in intensive care units (PS-ICU) scale have good psychometric properties in all countries. It includes six broad dimensions covering generic or specific stressors to ICU, and thus, enables the identification of work situations that are likely to generate high levels of stress at the individual and unit levels. For future studies, this tool will enable the implementation of targeted corrective actions on which intervention research can be based. It also enables national and international comparisons of stressors' impact.

Indexed as

Health care professionalsIntensive care unitJob stressPS-ICU scale

Identifiers

PMID33837861
PMCPMC8036172
OpenAlexW3145952093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.