ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2022
Investigation of motor self-monitoring deficits in schizophrenia with passivity experiences using a novel modified joint position matching paradigm.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous studies have identified deficits in the self-monitoring system that are associated with schizophrenia. However, the tasks used in the few previous studies generally involved complex cognitive processes and rarely compared between patients with and without passivity experiences (PE). Here, we examined the deficits in internal motor predictive representation in patients with and without PE, and in healthy controls using a novel paradigm which involved minimal cognitive processes. All participants completed a modified joint position matching (mJPM) task, in which they were required to replicate a voluntary, a passive verbally-cued, and a passive tactile-cued movement under blinded conditions. The absolute difference between the target spot and replicated spot was measured and compared. We hypothesised that if there was a failure in the internal motor predictive representation, patients with PEs would replicate less accurately in the voluntary condition, relative to passive conditions while the healthy controls would be more accurate, and, therefore, significant interactions between groups and conditions would be revealed. Both healthy controls and patients without PEs replicated more accurately in the voluntary condition compared with the passive conditions. The patients with PEs were less accurate in the voluntary condition compared with the passive tactile condition. A significant interaction was observed between patients with vs. without PEs × voluntary vs. passive tactile conditions. The findings suggested the relationship between deficits in motor self-monitoring in the prediction process and PEs, thus showing the need to highlight the link between motor performance and PEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33837844What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.