Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33837798›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2021

Non-radiologist-performed abdominal point-of-care ultrasonography in paediatrics - a scoping review.

Elsa A van Wassenaer, Joost G Daams, Marc A Benninga, Karen Rosendahl, Bart G P Koot, Samuel Stafrace, Owen J Arthurs, Rick R van Rijn

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pediatric Abdominal Ultrasound Training Program: Standard Views.Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  8. Pediatric abdominal ultrasound training program for pediatricians.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Management of Gastrointestinal Foreign Bodies with Brief Review of the Guidelines.Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elsa A van WassenaerEmma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Paediatric Gastroenterology, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.a.vanwassenaer@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3149-953X
Joost G DaamsAmsterdam UMC, Medical Library, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc A BenningaEmma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Paediatric Gastroenterology, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Karen RosendahlDepartment of Radiology, Section of Paediatric Radiology, University Hospital North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Bart G P KootEmma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Paediatric Gastroenterology, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Samuel StafraceDivision of Body imaging, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sidra Medicine and Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Owen J ArthursDepartment of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rick R van RijnAmsterdam UMC, Radiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistorically, US in the paediatric setting has mostly been the domain of radiologists. However, in the last decade, there has been an uptake of non-radiologist point-of-care US.

objectiveTo gain an overview of abdominal non-radiologist point-of-care US in paediatrics. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a scoping review regarding the uses of abdominal non-radiologist point-of-care US, quality of examinations and training, patient perspective, financial costs and legal consequences following the use of non-radiologist point-of-care US. We conducted an advanced search of the following databases: Medline, Embase and Web of Science Conference Proceedings. We included published original research studies describing abdominal non-radiologist point-of-care US in children. We limited studies to English-language articles from Western countries.

resultsWe found a total of 5,092 publications and selected 106 publications for inclusion: 39 studies and 51 case reports or case series on the state-of-art of abdominal non-radiologist point-of-care US, 14 on training of non-radiologists, and 1 each on possible harms following non-radiologist point-of-care US and patient satisfaction. According to included studies, non-radiologist point-of-care US is increasingly used, but no standardised training guidelines exist. We found no studies regarding the financial consequences of non-radiologist point-of-care US.

conclusionThis scoping review supports the further development of non-radiologist point-of-care US and underlines the need for consensus on who can do which examination after which level of training among US performers. More research is needed on training non-radiologists and on the costs-to-benefits of non-radiologist point-of-care US.

Indexed as

PediatricsPoint-of-Care SystemsAbdomenChildHumansRadiologistsUltrasonographyAbdomenChildrenNon-radiologistPoint-of-careScoping reviewTrainingUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID33837798
PMCPMC8266706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.