Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33837540›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2021

Cell lines of the same anatomic site and histologic type show large variability in intrinsic radiosensitivity and relative biological effectiveness to protons and carbon ions.

David B Flint, Scott J Bright, Conor H McFadden, Teruaki Konishi, Daisuke Ohsawa, Broderick Turner, Steven H Lin, David R Grosshans, Hua-Sheng Chiu, Pavel Sumazin and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Differentiation Stage Predicts Radiosensitivity in Mesenchymal-Like Pancreatic Cancer.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Experimental Setups for In Vitro Studies on Radon Exposure in Mammalian Cells-A Critical Overview.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

David B FlintThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA.
Scott J BrightDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Conor H McFaddenDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Teruaki KonishiSingle Cell Radiation Biology Group, Institute for Quantum Life Science, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Daisuke OhsawaDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences for Radiation Damages, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Broderick TurnerDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Steven H LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
David R GrosshansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Hua-Sheng ChiuTexas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Pavel SumazinTexas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Simona F ShaitelmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Gabriel O SawakuchiThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas RP170040Department of Radiation PhysicsNCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NIH HHS CA016672The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterUniversity Cancer Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo show that intrinsic radiosensitivity varies greatly for protons and carbon (C) ions in addition to photons, and that DNA repair capacity remains important in governing this variability.

methodsWe measured or obtained from the literature clonogenic survival data for a number of human cancer cell lines exposed to photons, protons (9.9 keV/μm), and C-ions (13.3-77.1 keV/μm). We characterized their intrinsic radiosensitivity by the dose for 10% or 50% survival (D

resultsWe found no statistically significant differences in the COVs of D

conclusionsEven for cell lines of the same histologic type, there are remarkable variations in intrinsic radiosensitivity, and these variations do not differ significantly between photon, proton or C-ion radiation. The importance of DNA repair capacity in governing the variability in intrinsic radiosensitivity is not significantly diminished for higher LET radiation.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsCarbonCell LineCell SurvivalHumansProtonsRadiation ToleranceRelative Biological EffectivenessCarbonProtonsparticle therapyradiosensitivityrelative biological effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID33837540
PMCPMC11919485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.