Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33837430›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2022

Alcohol affordability: implications for alcohol price policies. A cross-sectional analysis in middle and older adults from UK Biobank.

Simon C Moore, Bella Orpen, Jesse Smith, Chinmoy Sarkar, Chenlu Li, Jonathan Shepherd, Sarah Bauermeister

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Distinct Plasma Proteomic Signatures Distinguish MASLD From Non-Steatotic Individuals but Not From MetALD.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simon C MooreViolence Research Group, School of Dentistry, Cardiff CF14 4XY, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5495-4705
Bella OrpenCrime and Security Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AE, UK.
Jesse SmithCentre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3BD, UK.
Chinmoy SarkarHealthy High Density Cities Lab, HKUrbanLab, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Chenlu LiDeloitte LLP, London EC4A 3HQ, UK.
Jonathan ShepherdViolence Research Group, School of Dentistry, Cardiff CF14 4XY, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6466-2298
Sarah BauermeisterDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9463-6971

Funding

Expectancies and Evaluations of Alcohol ProblemsF31AA015471 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA · PI GAHER, RALUCA M · 2004 to 2005
$60k
Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853Medical Research Council MR/L023784/1Medical Research Council and Alcohol Research UK ES/L015471/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing the price of alcohol reduces alcohol consumption and harm. The role of food complementarity, transaction costs and inflation on alcohol demand are determined and discussed in relation to alcohol price policies.

methodsUK Biobank (N = 502,628) was linked by region to retail price quotes for the years 2007 to 2010. The log residual food and alcohol prices, and alcohol availability were regressed onto log daily alcohol consumption. Model standard errors were adjusted for clustering by region.

resultsAssociations with alcohol consumption were found for alcohol price (β = -0.56, 95% CI, -0.92 to -0.20) and availability (β = 0.06, 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.07). Introducing, food price reduced the alcohol price consumption association (β = -0.26, 95% CI, -0.50 to -0.03). Alcohol (B = 0.001, 95% CI, 0.0004 to 0.001) and food (B = 0.001, 95% CI, 0.0005 to 0.0006) price increased with time and were associated (ρ = 0.57, P < 0.001).

conclusionAlcohol and food are complements, and the price elasticity of alcohol reduces when the effect of food price is accounted for. Transaction costs did not affect the alcohol price consumption relationship. Fixed alcohol price policies are susceptible to inflation.

Indexed as

Alcoholic BeveragesCommerceAgedAlcohol DrinkingBiological Specimen BanksCosts and Cost AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPublic PolicyUnited Kingdomalcohol consumptionpublic health

Identifiers

PMID33837430
PMCPMC9234508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.