Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33837103›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Predicting the risk of drug-drug interactions in psychiatric hospitals: a retrospective longitudinal pharmacovigilance study.

Jan Wolff, Gudrun Hefner, Claus Normann, Klaus Kaier, Harald Binder, Katharina Domschke, Christoph Hiemke, Michael Marschollek, Ansgar Klimke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Factors associated with potential drug-drug interactions in psychiatric inpatients.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2024
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jan WolffPeter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany janwolff123@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2750-0606
Gudrun HefnerVitos Clinic for Forensic Psychiatry, Vitos Rheingau, Eltville, Germany.
Claus NormannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Klaus KaierInstitute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0837-6945
Harald BinderInstitute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Katharina DomschkeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Christoph HiemkeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Michael MarschollekPeter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Ansgar KlimkeWaldkrankenhaus Köppern, Vitos Hospital Hochtaunus, Friedrichsdorf, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DEVitos · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim was to use routine data available at a patient's admission to the hospital to predict polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions (DDI) and to evaluate the prediction performance with regard to its usefulness to support the efficient management of benefits and risks of drug prescriptions.

designRetrospective, longitudinal study.

settingWe used data from a large multicentred pharmacovigilance project carried out in eight psychiatric hospitals in Hesse, Germany.

participantsInpatient episodes consecutively discharged between 1 October 2017 and 30 September 2018 (year 1) or 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2019 (year 2). OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of rightly classified hospital episodes.

methodsWe used gradient boosting to predict respective outcomes. We tested the performance of our final models in unseen patients from another calendar year and separated the study sites used for training from the study sites used for performance testing.

resultsA total of 53 909 episodes were included in the study. The models' performance, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic, was 'excellent' (0.83) and 'acceptable' (0.72) compared with common benchmarks for the prediction of polypharmacy and DDI, respectively. Both models were substantially better than a naive prediction based solely on basic diagnostic grouping.

conclusionThis study has shown that polypharmacy and DDI can be predicted from routine data at patient admission. These predictions could support an efficient management of benefits and risks of hospital prescriptions, for instance by including pharmaceutical supervision early after admission for patients at risk before pharmacological treatment is established.

Indexed as

Hospitals, PsychiatricPharmaceutical PreparationsDrug InteractionsGermanyHumansLongitudinal StudiesPharmacovigilanceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsPharmaceutical Preparationsclinical pharmacologyhealth informaticspsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID33837103
PMCPMC8043005
OpenAlexW3152129326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.