Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33837050›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

Temporally Specific Roles of Ventral Tegmental Area Projections to the Nucleus Accumbens and Prefrontal Cortex in Attention and Impulse Control.

Jacques P Flores-Dourojeanni, Coby van Rijt, Marleen H van den Munkhof, Linde Boekhoudt, Mieneke C M Luijendijk, Louk J M J Vanderschuren, Roger A H Adan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacques P Flores-DourojeanniBrain Center Rudolf Magnus, Department of Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
Coby van RijtBrain Center Rudolf Magnus, Department of Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
Marleen H van den MunkhofBrain Center Rudolf Magnus, Department of Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
Linde BoekhoudtBrain Center Rudolf Magnus, Department of Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2872-9912
Mieneke C M LuijendijkBrain Center Rudolf Magnus, Department of Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
Louk J M J VanderschurenDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Animals in Science and Society, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CM, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5379-0363
Roger A H AdanBrain Center Rudolf Magnus, Department of Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands r.a.h.adan@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-8994-0661
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deficits in impulse control and attention are prominent in the symptomatology of mental disorders such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), substance addiction, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder, yet the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. Frontostriatal structures, such as the nucleus accumbens (NAcb), the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and their dopaminergic innervation from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) have been implicated in impulse control and attention. What remains unclear is how the temporal pattern of activity of these VTA projections contributes to these processes. Here, we optogenetically stimulated VTA dopamine (DA) cells, as well as VTA projections to the NAcb core (NAcbC), NAcb shell (NAcbS), and the mPFC in male rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT). Our data show that stimulation of VTA DA neurons, and VTA projections to the NAcbC and the mPFC immediately before presentation of the stimulus cue, impaired attention but spared impulse control. Importantly, in addition to reducing attention, activation of VTA-NAcbS also increased impulsivity when tested under a longer intertrial interval (ITI), to provoke impulsive behavior. Optogenetic stimulation at the beginning of the ITI only partially replicated these effects. In sum, our data show how attention and impulsivity are modulated by neuronal activity in distinct ascending output pathways from the VTA in a temporally specific manner. These findings increase our understanding of the intricate mechanisms by which mesocorticolimbic circuits contribute to cognition.

Indexed as

Impulsive BehaviorAnimalsAttentionAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCuesDopaminergic NeuronsElectric StimulationFemaleMaleNeural PathwaysNucleus AccumbensOptogeneticsPrefrontal CortexRatsRats, Long-EvansReaction Time5-CSRTTaccumbensattentiondopamineimpulsivityVTA

Identifiers

PMID33837050
PMCPMC8143200
OpenAlexW3148899431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.