Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33836775›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2021

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Perceived Risk of HIV Scale in Brazilian Portuguese.

Thiago S Torres, Paula M Luz, Luana M S Marins, Daniel R B Bezerra, Celline C Almeida-Brasil, Valdilea G Veloso, Beatriz Grinsztejn, Daphna Harel, Brett D Thombs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sexual Practices and HIV Risk Perception Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Brazil.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thiago S TorresInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, 21040-900, Brazil. thiago.torres@ini.fiocruz.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2557-601X
Paula M LuzInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, 21040-900, Brazil.
Luana M S MarinsInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, 21040-900, Brazil.
Daniel R B BezerraInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, 21040-900, Brazil.
Celline C Almeida-BrasilResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Valdilea G VelosoInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, 21040-900, Brazil.
Beatriz GrinsztejnInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, 21040-900, Brazil.
Daphna HarelDepartment of Applied Statistics, Social Science, and Humanities, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Brett D ThombsLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

The FIOCRUZ Therapeutic and Prevention HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials Unit (FioTrials)UM1AI069476 · NIAID · FUNDACAO OSWALDO CRUZ · PI BEATRIZ GRINSZTEJN · 2012 to 2026
$26.3M
The FIOCRUZ Therapeutic and Prevention HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials Unit (FioTrials)U01AI069476 · NIAID · FUNDACAO OSWALDO CRUZ · PI GRINSZTEJN, BEATRIZ · 2008 to 2011
$14.0M
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico CNPq, #28/2018Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Programa PrIntFundação Oswaldo Cruz Programa Inova FIOCRUZ, Edital Geração do Conhecimento/VPPCBNIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069476NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundValid and reliable instruments are needed to measure the multiple dimensions of perceived risk. The Perceived Risk of HIV Scale is an 8-item measure that assesses how people think and feel about their risk of infection. We set out to perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the scale to Brazilian Portuguese among key populations (gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men and transgender/non-binary) and other populations (cisgender heterosexual men and cisgender women).

methodsMethodological study with cross-sectional design conducted online during October/2019 (key populations [sample 1] and other populations) and February-March/2020 (key populations not on pre-exposure prophylaxis [sample 2]). Cross-cultural adaptation of the Perceived Risk of HIV Scale followed Beaton et al. 2000 guidelines and included confirmatory factor analysis, differential item functioning (DIF) using the Multiple-Indicator Multiple-Cause model, and concurrent validity to verify if younger individuals, those ever testing for HIV, and engaging in high-risk behaviors had higher scores on the scale.

results4342 participants from key populations (sample 1 = 235; sample 2 = 4107) and 155 participants from other populations completed the measure. We confirmed the single-factor structure of the original measure (fit indices for sample 1 plus other populations: CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.07; sample 2 plus other populations: CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.09). For the comparisons between key populations and other populations, three items (item 2: "I worry about getting infected with HIV", item 4: "I am sure I will not get infected with HIV", and item 8: "Getting HIV is something I have") exhibited statistically significant DIF. Items 2 and 8 were endorsed at higher levels by key populations and item 4 by other populations. However, the effect of DIF on overall scores was negligible (0.10 and 0.02 standard deviations for the models with other populations plus sample 1 and 2, respectively). Those ever testing for HIV scored higher than those who never tested (p < .001); among key populations, those engaging in high-risk behaviors scored higher than those reporting low-risk.

conclusionThe Perceived Risk of HIV Scale can be used among key populations and other populations from Brazil.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonAdolescentAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesEthnicityFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentSexual and Gender MinoritiesBrazilGBMHIV perceived riskHIV risk-behaviorPerceived risk of HIV ScalePsychometric propertiesTransgender

Identifiers

PMID33836775
PMCPMC8033701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.