Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33836738›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2021

Biofilm reduction potential of 0.02% polyhexanide irrigation solution in several types of urethral catheters.

Florian H H Brill, Julia Hambach, Christian Utpatel, Diana C Mogrovejo, Henrik Gabriel, Jan-Hendrik Klock, Joerg Steinmann, Andreas Arndt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Florian H H BrillDr. Brill + Partner GmbH Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, Stiegstück 34, 22339, Hamburg, Germany. florian.b@brillhygiene.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9681-8752
Julia HambachDr. Brill + Partner GmbH Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, Stiegstück 34, 22339, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian UtpatelMolecular and Experimental Mycobacteriology, Research Center Borstel - Leibniz Lung Center, Borstel, Germany.
Diana C MogrovejoDr. Brill + Partner GmbH Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, Stiegstück 34, 22339, Hamburg, Germany.
Henrik GabrielDr. Brill + Partner GmbH Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, Stiegstück 34, 22339, Hamburg, Germany.
Jan-Hendrik KlockDr. Brill + Partner GmbH Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, Stiegstück 34, 22339, Hamburg, Germany.
Joerg SteinmannKlinikum Nürnberg, Institute of Clinical Hygiene, Medical Microbiology and Infectiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
Andreas ArndtDepartment of Research and Development, B. Braun Medical Ltd., Sempach, Switzerland.
Dr. Brill + Dr. Steinmann (Germany) · DEB. Braun (Switzerland) · CHNuremberg Hospital · DEResearch Center Borstel - Leibniz Lung Center · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term use of urethral catheters is associated with high risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) and blockage. Microbial biofilms are a common cause of catheter blockage, reducing their lifetime and significantly increasing morbidity of UTIs. A 0.02% polyhexanide irrigation solution developed for routine mechanical rinsing shows potential for bacterial decolonization of urethral catheters and has the potential to reduce or prevent biofilm formation.

methodsUsing an in vitro assay with standard market-leading types of catheters artificially contaminated with clinically relevant bacteria, assays were carried out to evaluate the biofilm reduction and prevention potential of a 0.02% polyhexanide solution versus no intervention (standard approach) and irrigation with saline solution (NaCl 0.9%). The efficiency of decolonization was measured through microbial plate count and membrane filtration.

resultsIrrigation using a 0.02% polyhexanide solution is suitable for the decolonization of a variety of transurethral catheters. The effect observed is significant compared to irrigation with 0.9% saline solution (p = 0.002) or no treatment (p = 0.011). No significant difference was found between irrigation with 0.9% saline solution and no treatment (p = 0.74).

conclusionsA 0.02% polyhexanide solution is able to reduce bacterial biofilm from catheters artificially contaminated with clinically relevant bacteria in vitro. The data shows a reduction of the viability of thick bacterial biofilms in a variety of commercially available urinary catheters made from silicone, latex-free silicone, hydrogel-coated silicone and PVC. Further research is required to evaluate the long-term tolerability and efficacy of polyhexanide in clinical practice.

Indexed as

BiguanidesBiofilmsDisinfectantsEquipment ContaminationHumansTherapeutic IrrigationUrinary CathetersBiguanidesDisinfectantspolihexanideBacterial decolonizationBiofilmPolyhexanideTransurethral catheterUrinary catheterUrinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID33836738
PMCPMC8034122
OpenAlexW3144779157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.