Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33836695›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2021

One "misunderstood" health issue: demonstrating and communicating the safety of influenza a vaccination in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Qing Chun Lu, Tie Yun Zhang, Pravesh Kumar Bundhun, Cheng Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Vaccination in pregnancy: The role of the midwife.Frontiers in global women's health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qing Chun Lu *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530000, People's Republic of China.
Tie Yun Zhang *Department of Communication, School of Journalism and New Media, Xi'An JiaoTong University, Xi'An, Shanxi, 710000, People's Republic of China.
Pravesh Kumar BundhunDepartment of Internal Medicine, Flacq Hospital, Central Flacq, Mauritius.
Cheng ChenDepartment of Broadcasting and Television, School of Journalism and Information Communication, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, People's Republic of China. 15062275812@163.com.
Guangxi Medical University · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) makes certain recommendations including the annual influenza vaccination of pregnant and pre-pregnant women during influenza (flu) season with an inactivated influenza vaccine as soon as it becomes available. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices in association with ACOG state that the vaccine is safe to be given any trimester during pregnancy. However, due to a lack of communication, the public is unaware of the effects of influenza A vaccination in pregnancy. Since this is a vital public health concern, we aimed to communicate with evidence, the safety of influenza A vaccination in pregnancy in order to improve the rate of influenza A vaccines in pregnant women.

methodsThis health communication issue was based on the impact of influenza vaccine on fetal outcomes. Therefore, a search was carried out through medical-based online databases including: Cochrane Central, EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE, http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov , and Google scholar for relevant English-based publications. Adverse fetal outcomes were considered as the endpoints of this analysis. The most specific RevMan 5.3 (latest version) software was used to carry out this analysis. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were involved in data and results representation and interpretation.

resultsA total number of 679, 992 pregnant women participated in this analysis. Based on this current analysis, premature/preterm birth (< 37 weeks) was significantly reduced in pregnant women who were vaccinated for influenza A (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69-0.92; P = 0.002) as compared to those women who were not vaccinated. Similarly, influenza A vaccination decreased the risk for very preterm birth (< 32 weeks) (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58-0.84; P = 0.0001). The risks for infants with low birth weight (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.49-1.04; P = 0.08), very low birth weight (RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.23-2.11; P = 0.52) and infants small for gestational age (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.83-1.05; P = 0.26) were not increased with the vaccine. Influenza A vaccination was not associated with increased risks of stillbirth (RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.38-1.03; P = 0.07), birth defects (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.26-1.72; P = 0.41), admission to neonatal intensive care unit or Apgar score < 7 in 5 min.

conclusionInfluenza vaccine is completely safe in pregnancy. It significantly lowers premature birth and is not associated with any serious adverse neonatal outcome. Hence, this important piece of information should be communicated and conveyed to all pregnant women, for a safer and healthier pregnancy. At last, this public health issue should further be addressed to the population through media and other communication means in order to improve the rate of influenza A vaccines in pregnant women for a healthier and more productive population.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesPregnancy ComplicationsPremature BirthFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeVaccinationInfluenza VaccinesCentre of disease control and preventionCommunication scholarsFetal outcomesHealth communicationInfluenza vaccinePregnancyPublic healthRisk ratio

Identifiers

PMID33836695
PMCPMC8034177
OpenAlexW3145547732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.