Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33836681›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

Multi gene mutation signatures in colorectal cancer patients: predict for the diagnosis, pathological classification, staging and prognosis.

Yan Zhuang, Hailong Wang, Da Jiang, Ying Li, Lixia Feng, Caijuan Tian, Mingyu Pu, Xiaowei Wang, Jiangyan Zhang, Yuanjing Hu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Mechanisms and Strategies to Overcome Drug Resistance in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Molecular identification ofMolecular biology research communications · 2025
    Article
  13. Unveiling the role ofTranslational cancer research · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yan Zhuang *Department of Colorectal Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Hailong Wang *Department of Oncology, Tianjin Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, No.354 Beima Road, Hongqiao District, Tianjin, 300120, China.
Da JiangDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei, China.
Ying LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei, China.
Lixia FengDepartment of Nursing, Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin, 300300, China.
Caijuan TianTianjin Marvel Medical Laboratory, Tianjin Marvelbio Technology Co., Ltd, Tianjin, 300381, China.
Mingyu PuTianjin Marvel Medical Laboratory, Tianjin Marvelbio Technology Co., Ltd, Tianjin, 300381, China.
Xiaowei WangTianjin Yunquan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd, Tianjin, 300381, China.
Jiangyan ZhangTianjin Yunquan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd, Tianjin, 300381, China.
Yuanjing HuDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics & Gynecology, No. 156 Nankai Third Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300100, China. huyuanjingtianjin@163.com.
Pengfei LiuDepartment of Oncology, Tianjin Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, No.354 Beima Road, Hongqiao District, Tianjin, 300120, China. 9957600@163.com.
Hebei Medical University · CNTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNTianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics · CN

Funding

Tianjin Science and Technology Plan Project 17ZXMFSY00160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying gene mutation signatures will enable a better understanding for the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer (CRC), and provide some potential biomarkers for clinical practice. Currently, however, there is still few effective biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognostic judgment in CRC patients. The purpose was to identify novel mutation signatures for the diagnosis and prognosis of CRC.

methodsClinical information of 531 CRC patients and their sequencing data were downloaded from TCGA database (training group), and 53 clinical patients were collected and sequenced with targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) technology (validation group). The relationship between the mutation genes and the diagnosis, pathological type, stage and prognosis of CRC were compared to construct signatures for CRC, and then analyzed their relationship with RNA expression, immunocyte infiltration and tumor microenvironment (TME).

resultsMutations of TP53, APC, KRAS, BRAF and ATM covered 97.55% of TCGA population and 83.02% validation patients. Moreover, 57.14% validation samples and 22.06% TCGA samples indicated that patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma tended to have BRAF mutation, but no TP53 mutation. Mutations of TP53, PIK3CA, FAT4, FMN2 and TRRAP had a remarkable difference between I-II and III-IV stage patients (P < 0.0001). Besides, the combination of PIK3CA, LRP1B, FAT4 and ROS1 formed signatures for the prognosis and survival of CRC patients. The mutations of TP53, APC, KRAS, BRAF, ATM, PIK3CA, FAT4, FMN2, TRRAP, LRP1B, and ROS1 formed the signatures for predicting diagnosis and prognosis of CRC. Among them, mutation of TP53, APC, KRAS, BRAF, ATM, PIK3CA, FAT4 and TRRAP significantly reduced their RNA expression level. Stromal score, immune score and ESTIMATE score were lower in patients with TP53, APC, KRAS, PIK3CA mutation compared non-mutation patients. All the 11 gene mutations affected the distributions of immune cells.

conclusionThis study constructed gene mutation signatures for the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis in CRC, and proved that their mutations affected RNA expression levels, TME and immunocyte infiltration. Our results put forward further insights into the genotype of CRC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorMutationAdultAgedAllelesColorectal NeoplasmsComputational BiologyFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorProto-Oncogene ProteinsTumor Suppressor ProteinsColorectal cancer (CRC)GenotypePathological classificationPrognosisStaging

Identifiers

PMID33836681
PMCPMC8034139
OpenAlexW3145382638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.