Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33836566›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Hexokinase 2 discerns a novel circulating tumor cell population associated with poor prognosis in lung cancer patients.

Liu Yang, Xiaowei Yan, Jie Chen, Qiong Zhan, Yingqi Hua, Shili Xu, Ziming Li, Zhuo Wang, Yu Dong, Dongqing Zuo and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Targeting the Warburg Effect in Cancer: Where Do We Stand?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Liu YangDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Bone Tumor Institute, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Xiaowei YanInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109.ORCID 0000-0003-4215-1395
Jie ChenKey Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Qiong ZhanDepartment of Oncology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Yingqi HuaDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Bone Tumor Institute, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Shili XuDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.ORCID 0000-0002-4933-8673
Ziming LiShanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Zhuo WangShanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yu DongKey Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Dongqing ZuoDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Bone Tumor Institute, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Min XueKey Laboratory of Whole-Period Monitoring and Precise Intervention of Digestive Cancer (SMHC), Minhang Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201199, China.
Yin TangInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109.
Harvey R HerschmanDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Shun LuShanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China; shunlu@sjtu.edu.cn qihuishi@fudan.edu.cn wwei@systemsbiology.org.
Qihui ShiShanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China; shunlu@sjtu.edu.cn qihuishi@fudan.edu.cn wwei@systemsbiology.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8403-9452
Wei WeiInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109; shunlu@sjtu.edu.cn qihuishi@fudan.edu.cn wwei@systemsbiology.org.ORCID 0000-0002-1018-7708
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNFudan University · CNUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USInstitute for Systems Biology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike other epithelial cancer types, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are less frequently detected in the peripheral blood of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using epithelial marker-based detection approaches despite the aggressive nature of NSCLC. Here, we demonstrate hexokinase-2 (HK2) as a metabolic function-associated marker for the detection of CTCs. In 59 NSCLC patients bearing cytokeratin-positive (CK

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionErbB ReceptorsGenotypeHexokinaseHumansKeratinsLiquid BiopsyLung NeoplasmsNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPrognosisEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsHexokinaseHK2 protein, humanKeratinscirculating tumor cellshexokinase-2liquid biopsynon–small cell lung cancersingle-cell sequencing

Identifiers

PMID33836566
PMCPMC7980452
OpenAlexW3134177357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.