ArticleJournal of neural engineering2021
Unsupervised machine learning can delineate central sulcus by using the spatiotemporal characteristic of somatosensory evoked potentials.
Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-resolution cortical mapping within and across the central sulcus using 1024-electrode micro-electrocorticography arrays: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Mapping of the central sulcus using non-invasive ultra-high-density brain recordings.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Long-latency gamma modulation after median nerve stimulation delineates the central sulcus and contrasts the states of consciousness.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Machine learning and clinical neurophysiology.Journal of neurology · 2022Article
- Automated intraoperative central sulcus localization and somatotopic mapping using median nerve stimulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.