Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33836454›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2021

Discriminating cognitive motor dissociation from disorders of consciousness using structural MRI.

Polona Pozeg, Jane Jöhr, Alessandro Pincherle, Guillaume Marie, Philippe Ryvlin, Reto Meuli, Patric Hagmann, Karin Diserens, Vincent Dunet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Polona PozegDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jane JöhrNeurology and Acute Neurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alessandro PincherleNeurology and Acute Neurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Hopitaux Robert Schuman, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Guillaume MarieDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Philippe RyvlinNeurology and Acute Neurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Reto MeuliDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Patric HagmannDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Karin DiserensNeurology and Acute Neurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: karin.diserens@chuv.ch.
Vincent DunetDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: vincent.dunet@chuv.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An accurate evaluation and detection of awareness after a severe brain injury is crucial to a patient's diagnosis, therapy, and end-of-life decisions. Misdiagnosis is frequent as behavior-based assessments often overlook subtle signs of consciousness. This study aimed to identify brain MRI characteristics of patients with residual consciousness after a severe brain injury and to develop a simple MRI-based scoring system according to the findings. We retrieved data from 128 patients and split them into a development or validation set. Structural brain MRIs were qualitatively assessed for lesions in 18 brain regions. We used logistic regression and support vector machine algorithms to first identify the most relevant brain regions predicting a patient's outcome in the development set. We next built a diagnostic MRI-based score and estimated its optimal diagnostic cut-off point. The classifiers were then tested on the validation set and their performance compared using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Relevant brain regions predicting negative outcome highly overlapped between both classifiers and included the left mesencephalon, right basal ganglia, right thalamus, right parietal cortex, and left frontal cortex. The support vector machine classifier showed higher accuracy (0.93, 95% CI: 0.81-0.96) and specificity (0.97, 95% CI: 0.85-1) than logistic regression (accuracy: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.73 - 0.95; specificity: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.75-0.97), but equal sensitivity (0.67, 95% CI: 0.24-0.94 and 0.22-0.96, respectively) for distinguishing patients with and without residual consciousness. The novel MRI-based score assessing brain lesions in patients with disorders of consciousness accurately detects patients with residual consciousness. It could complement valuably behavioral evaluation as it is time-efficient and requires only conventional MRI.

Indexed as

ConsciousnessMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainConsciousness DisordersHumansNeuroimagingBrain injuryCognitive motor dissociationDisorders of consciousnessStructural MRISupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID33836454
PMCPMC8056460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.