ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2021
Discriminating cognitive motor dissociation from disorders of consciousness using structural MRI.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating qualitative and quantitative MRI analysis for optimizing DBS candidate selection in patients with disorders of consciousness.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Explaining recovery from coma with multimodal neuroimaging.Journal of neurology · 2024Observational
- Family caregivers improve the diagnostic accuracy of disorders of consciousness: from remote to near-bed auditory stimulation.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2024Article
- A Focus on Subtle Signs and Motor Behavior to Unveil Awareness in Unresponsive Brain-Impaired Patients: The Importance of Being Clinical.Neurology · 2023Article
- Disorder of consciousness: Structural integrity of brain networks for the clinical assessment.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023Article
- Clinical Cognitive Motor Dissociation: A Case Report Showing How Pitfalls Can Hinder Early Clinical Detection of Awareness.Brain sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An accurate evaluation and detection of awareness after a severe brain injury is crucial to a patient's diagnosis, therapy, and end-of-life decisions. Misdiagnosis is frequent as behavior-based assessments often overlook subtle signs of consciousness. This study aimed to identify brain MRI characteristics of patients with residual consciousness after a severe brain injury and to develop a simple MRI-based scoring system according to the findings. We retrieved data from 128 patients and split them into a development or validation set. Structural brain MRIs were qualitatively assessed for lesions in 18 brain regions. We used logistic regression and support vector machine algorithms to first identify the most relevant brain regions predicting a patient's outcome in the development set. We next built a diagnostic MRI-based score and estimated its optimal diagnostic cut-off point. The classifiers were then tested on the validation set and their performance compared using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Relevant brain regions predicting negative outcome highly overlapped between both classifiers and included the left mesencephalon, right basal ganglia, right thalamus, right parietal cortex, and left frontal cortex. The support vector machine classifier showed higher accuracy (0.93, 95% CI: 0.81-0.96) and specificity (0.97, 95% CI: 0.85-1) than logistic regression (accuracy: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.73 - 0.95; specificity: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.75-0.97), but equal sensitivity (0.67, 95% CI: 0.24-0.94 and 0.22-0.96, respectively) for distinguishing patients with and without residual consciousness. The novel MRI-based score assessing brain lesions in patients with disorders of consciousness accurately detects patients with residual consciousness. It could complement valuably behavioral evaluation as it is time-efficient and requires only conventional MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.