Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33836148›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. Psychiatry2021

6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records.

Maxime Taquet, John R Geddes, Masud Husain, Sierra Luciano, Paul J Harrison

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. Psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1,161 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,161citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
213.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04949061 nacompletednot on this map

Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Intervention to Reduce Psychological Distress Among COVID-19 Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKoç UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled34ConditionsPsychological Distress, Quality of Life, Depressive Symptoms, AnxietyArmsCulturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (CA-CBI), Enhanced Treatment as Usual (ETA-U)
NCT05139979 nacompletednot on this map

Yogic Breathing and Guided Meditation for Long Covid Symptoms

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRan2021 to 2024Enrolled189ConditionsCOVID-19, Stress, Shortness of BreathArmsBreathing and Wellness Webinar, Routine Daily Activity
NCT05268523 narecruitingnot on this map

Interventions to Teach Self-management Skills for Persisting Symptoms of COVID-19: Minimizing Impact of Symptoms on Everyday Functioning and on Healthcare Usage/utilization

TypeinterventionalSponsorToronto Rehabilitation InstituteRan2021 to 2025Enrolled270ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsEducation and Strategies Intervention, Mindfulness Skills Intervention
NCT05348720 unknown statusnot on this map

Impact of a COVID-19 Related ICU Stay on Mental Health for Patients and Their Relatives. An Exploratory 18-month Follow-up Study for COVID-19 ICU Survivors and Their Relatives.

TypeobservationalSponsorGeneral Hospital GroeningeRan2020 to 2023Enrolled120ConditionsPost Intensive Care Syndrome, PICS, COVID-19, Critically Ill
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,161 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2,192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cost-effectiveness of plasmapheresis and hemoperfusion in COVID-19 survivors: A six-month follow-up analysis after hospital discharge.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Neurodegenerative and Cognitive Consequences of Long COVID.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

1,101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maxime TaquetDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
John R GeddesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Masud HusainNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Sierra LucianoTriNetX, Cambridge MA, USA.
Paul J HarrisonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: paul.harrison@psych.ox.ac.uk.
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBTriNetX (United States) · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurological and psychiatric sequelae of COVID-19 have been reported, but more data are needed to adequately assess the effects of COVID-19 on brain health. We aimed to provide robust estimates of incidence rates and relative risks of neurological and psychiatric diagnoses in patients in the 6 months following a COVID-19 diagnosis.

methodsFor this retrospective cohort study and time-to-event analysis, we used data obtained from the TriNetX electronic health records network (with over 81 million patients). Our primary cohort comprised patients who had a COVID-19 diagnosis; one matched control cohort included patients diagnosed with influenza, and the other matched control cohort included patients diagnosed with any respiratory tract infection including influenza in the same period. Patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 or a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 were excluded from the control cohorts. All cohorts included patients older than 10 years who had an index event on or after Jan 20, 2020, and who were still alive on Dec 13, 2020. We estimated the incidence of 14 neurological and psychiatric outcomes in the 6 months after a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19: intracranial haemorrhage; ischaemic stroke; parkinsonism; Guillain-Barré syndrome; nerve, nerve root, and plexus disorders; myoneural junction and muscle disease; encephalitis; dementia; psychotic, mood, and anxiety disorders (grouped and separately); substance use disorder; and insomnia. Using a Cox model, we compared incidences with those in propensity score-matched cohorts of patients with influenza or other respiratory tract infections. We investigated how these estimates were affected by COVID-19 severity, as proxied by hospitalisation, intensive therapy unit (ITU) admission, and encephalopathy (delirium and related disorders). We assessed the robustness of the differences in outcomes between cohorts by repeating the analysis in different scenarios. To provide benchmarking for the incidence and risk of neurological and psychiatric sequelae, we compared our primary cohort with four cohorts of patients diagnosed in the same period with additional index events: skin infection, urolithiasis, fracture of a large bone, and pulmonary embolism.

findingsAmong 236 379 patients diagnosed with COVID-19, the estimated incidence of a neurological or psychiatric diagnosis in the following 6 months was 33·62% (95% CI 33·17-34·07), with 12·84% (12·36-13·33) receiving their first such diagnosis. For patients who had been admitted to an ITU, the estimated incidence of a diagnosis was 46·42% (44·78-48·09) and for a first diagnosis was 25·79% (23·50-28·25). Regarding individual diagnoses of the study outcomes, the whole COVID-19 cohort had estimated incidences of 0·56% (0·50-0·63) for intracranial haemorrhage, 2·10% (1·97-2·23) for ischaemic stroke, 0·11% (0·08-0·14) for parkinsonism, 0·67% (0·59-0·75) for dementia, 17·39% (17·04-17·74) for anxiety disorder, and 1·40% (1·30-1·51) for psychotic disorder, among others. In the group with ITU admission, estimated incidences were 2·66% (2·24-3·16) for intracranial haemorrhage, 6·92% (6·17-7·76) for ischaemic stroke, 0·26% (0·15-0·45) for parkinsonism, 1·74% (1·31-2·30) for dementia, 19·15% (17·90-20·48) for anxiety disorder, and 2·77% (2·31-3·33) for psychotic disorder. Most diagnostic categories were more common in patients who had COVID-19 than in those who had influenza (hazard ratio [HR] 1·44, 95% CI 1·40-1·47, for any diagnosis; 1·78, 1·68-1·89, for any first diagnosis) and those who had other respiratory tract infections (1·16, 1·14-1·17, for any diagnosis; 1·32, 1·27-1·36, for any first diagnosis). As with incidences, HRs were higher in patients who had more severe COVID-19 (eg, those admitted to ITU compared with those who were not: 1·58, 1·50-1·67, for any diagnosis; 2·87, 2·45-3·35, for any first diagnosis). Results were robust to various sensitivity analyses and benchmarking against the four additional index health events.

interpretationOur study provides evidence for substantial neurological and psychiatric morbidity in the 6 months after COVID-19 infection. Risks were greatest in, but not limited to, patients who had severe COVID-19. This information could help in service planning and identification of research priorities. Complementary study designs, including prospective cohorts, are needed to corroborate and explain these findings.

fundingNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanMental DisordersNervous System DiseasesRespiratory Tract InfectionsCohort StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareProportional Hazards ModelsResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID33836148
PMCPMC8023694
OpenAlexW3148333766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.