Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33836028›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Initial validation of the Italian version of the Volition in Exercise Questionnaire (VEQ-I).

Maria Chiara Gallotta, Valerio Bonavolontà, Laura Guidetti, Carlo Baldari, Lorenzo Innocenti, Ludovica Cardinali, Lavinia Falcioni, Selenia di Fronso, Gian Pietro Emerenziani, Giovanna Zimatore and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Live Streaming vs. Pre-Recorded Training during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italian Rhythmic Gymnastics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria Chiara GallottaDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology "Vittorio Erspamer", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5532-6380
Valerio BonavolontàDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Laura GuidettiUniversità degli Studi Niccolò Cusano, Rome, Italy.
Carlo BaldarieCampus University, Novedrate, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6227-3571
Lorenzo InnocentiDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Ludovica CardinaliDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1581-8027
Lavinia FalcioniDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8704-7044
Selenia di FronsoDepartment of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Gian Pietro EmerenzianiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Giovanna ZimatoreeCampus University, Novedrate, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6009-4465
Maurizio BertolloDepartment of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0972-9178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to validate the Volition in Exercise Questionnaire in Italian language (VEQ-I). The translation and cultural adaptation of the VEQ-I was conducted using the forward-backward translation method. VEQ-I eighteen items correspond to the six-factors structure of the original version. The construct validity was verified by the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (CFI = 0.960; TLI = 0.943; RMSEA = 0.039; and SRMR = 0.040). The eighteen items were well distributed in six subscales and the six-factors structure of the questionnaire was supported. Internal Consistency value of the questionnaire was investigated for each subscale of the VEQ-I. Cronbach's alpha and Omega values of the Reasons, Postponing Training, Unrelated Thoughts, Self-Confidence, Approval from Others and Coping with Failure subscales were 0.76 (α) and 0.76 (ω), 0.76 (α) and 0.76 (ω), 0.87 (α) and 0.88 (ω), 0.85 (α) and 0.85 (ω), 0.70 (α) and 0.72 (ω) and 0.74 (α) and 0.74 (ω), respectively. They were acceptable in all the six subscales. The concurrent validity was assessed using the correlation among the subscales of VEQ-I measures and those contained in two questionnaires: Psychobiosocial States in Physical Education (PBS-SPE) and Exercise Motivations Inventory (EMI-2).

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultDisability EvaluationExerciseFemaleHumansItalyMalePsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsVolition

Identifiers

PMID33836028
PMCPMC8034746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.