Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33835861›Full record

SynthesisDento maxillo facial radiology2021

Frontal sinuses as tools for human identification: a systematic review of imaging methods.

Julia Gabriela Dietrichkeit Pereira, Juliane Bustamante Sá Santos, Silmara Pereira de Sousa, Ademir Franco, Ricardo Henrique Alves Silva

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Automatic Personal Identification Using a Single MRI Slice.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Forensic radiology : Introduction and overview].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia Gabriela Dietrichkeit PereiraDepartment of Pathology and Legal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, USP-University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Juliane Bustamante Sá SantosDepartment of Pathology and Legal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, USP-University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Silmara Pereira de SousaDepartment of Pathology and Legal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, USP-University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8124-9611
Ademir FrancoDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculty of São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Brazil.
Ricardo Henrique Alves SilvaDepartment of Stomatology, Public Health and Forensic Odontology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, USP-University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The frontal sinuses are potential evidences for human identification because of the inherent distinctiveness of their morphology. Over the last decades, several techniques emerged to enable the visualization and analysis of the frontal sinuses via bi- and three-dimensional imaging. This systematic review aimed to compile different methodological approaches found in the scientific literature to contribute to human identification. Three examiners revisited the scientific literature in order to find imaging techniques for the visualization of the frontal sinuses applied to human identification. The standard search strings built-up from a PICO question identified 404 unique articles in the following databases Medline/Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, Lilacs and Scielo. Based on eligibility criteria applied during title, abstract and full-text reading, the sample reduced to 19 articles. The articles were published between 1987 and 2019 by research groups from 10 different countries. Computed tomography was used in 37% of the techniques, while the remaining (63%) techniques used skull radiographs. The techniques were highly heterogeneous and varied between metric analysis, direct image superimposition and morphology code-based systems. The authors considered their techniques useful for human identification and reported accuracy rates from 13 to 100%. Most of the studies revealed low risk of bias. More advantages were related with the techniques based on direct image superimpositions and three-dimensional visualization. Forensic experts must be aware of the use of frontal sinuses for human identification, especially when three-dimensional images are available as ante-mortem and post-mortem evidences for superimposition and comparison.

Indexed as

Forensic AnthropologyFrontal SinusHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalRadiographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedForensicsHuman identificationImagingMorphologyRadiology

Identifiers

PMID33835861
PMCPMC8231681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.