ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021
Motif Discovery from CLIP Experiments.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Positional motif analysis reveals the extent of specificity of protein-RNA interactions observed by CLIP.Genome biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNA primary and secondary motif discovery is an important step in the annotation and characterization of unknown interaction dynamics between RNAs and RNA-Binding Proteins, and several methods have been developed to meet the need of fast and efficient discovery of interaction motifs. Recent advances have increased the amount of data produced by experimental assays and there is no available method suitable for the analysis of all type of results. Here we present a simple workflow to help choosing the more appropriate method, depending on the starting situation, among the three algorithms that best cover the landscape of approaches. A detailed analysis is presented to highlight the need for different algorithms in different working settings. In conclusion, the proposed workflow depends on the nature of the starting data and on the availability of RNA annotations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33835436What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.