Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33835412›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021

Psychometric evaluation of a patient-reported item bank for healthcare engagement.

Benjamin D Schalet, Steven P Reise, Donna M Zulman, Eleanor T Lewis, Rachel Kimerling

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Changes in healthcare engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin D SchaletDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA. b-schalet@northwestern.edu.
Steven P ReiseDepartment of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, USA.
Donna M ZulmanCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, USA.
Eleanor T LewisCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, USA.
Rachel KimerlingNational Center for PTSD, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, USA.
Center for Innovation · USNational Center for PTSD · USNorthwestern University · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

HSRD VA I01 HX002317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHealthcare engagement is a core measurement target for efforts to improve healthcare systems. This construct is broadly defined as the extent to which healthcare services represent collaborative partnerships with patients. Previous qualitative work operationalized healthcare engagement as generalized self-efficacy in four related subdomains: self-management, collaborative communication, health information use, and healthcare navigation. Building on this work, our objective was to establish a healthcare engagement instrument that is sufficiently unidimensional to yield a single score.

methodWe conducted cognitive interviews followed by a nation-wide mail survey of US Veteran Administration (VA) healthcare users. Data were collected on 49 candidate healthcare engagement items, as well as measures of self-efficacy for managing symptoms, provider communication, and perceived access. Items were subjected to exploratory bifactor, statistical learning, and IRT analyses.

resultsCognitive interviews were completed by 56 patients and 9552 VA healthcare users with chronic conditions completed the mail survey. Participants were mostly white and male but with sizable minority participation. Psychometric analyses and content considerations reduced the item pool to 23 items, which demonstrated a strong general factor (OmegaH of .89). IRT analyses revealed a high level of reliability across the trait range and little DIF across groups. Most health information use items were removed during analyses, suggesting a more independent role for this domain.

conclusionWe provide quantitative evidence for a relatively unidimensional measure of healthcare engagement. Despite developed with VA healthcare users, the measure is intended for general use. Future work includes short-form development and validation with other patient groups.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeDelivery of Health CareHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCommunicationHealthcare engagementHealthcare navigationHealthcare systemPatient-reported outcomesProviders

Identifiers

PMID33835412
PMCPMC10262960
OpenAlexW3144713492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.