ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Development and evaluation of air pollution-linked quality of life (AP-QOL) questionnaire: insight from two different cohorts.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The QDIS-7: using one scale to measure the disease-specific quality-of-life impact of different medical conditions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, the air pollution-related quality of life (AP-QOL) questionnaire was carried out in two geographically and economically different groups including New Delhi (Megacity) and Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh (town), and APE scores were linked with respiratory and cardiovascular illness. The APE-Score was developed by AP-QOL questionnaire responses using Delphi technique and further analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA). For reliability of APE-Score and AP-QOL questionnaire, α-Cronbach's test and basic statistics were performed. The linear mixed-effect model and odds ratios were used to evaluate air pollution exposure and health outcomes. Overall, 720 academicians and 276 security guards were invited to participate in the questionnaire. Cronbach's α coefficients ranged from 0.70 to 0.84 indicated significant reliability in the AP-QOL questionnaire conducted in this study. Substantial variation in respiratory symptoms and their medical history were found - 76.9% ([95% confidential interval (CI)]: (- 83.8, - 66.9) (p < 0.05)) and - 28.6% (95% CI: (- 37.8, - 18.0) (p < 0.05)), respectively, with interquartile range (IQR) increase of APE score. The odds ratios (ORs) of respiratory medical history (MH Res.) showed a significant increase from 1.01 to 1.35 for low to high air pollution exposure in the academic group of IIT Delhi. Interestingly, for an academic group of NITH, the ORs for medical history of cardiovascular (MH Card.) showed an increase from 1.08 to 1.13 for low to high APE which was not the case for IIT Delhi academicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33835344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.